PICKLES

Hien Truong M

mens 26–13 · mixed 17–9

+5.4 (+3.8…+6.6)
pts vs avg pairing (90% interval)
#15
of 286 active men (within gender only)
43–22
career record · 66% wins, 58% of points
—
6-month form

Skill trajectory

Monthly posterior value (converted to points vs an average pairing) with a 90% credible band. Flat months = little evidence, not zero games.

2024-01 · +4.3 pts (90% band +2.2 to +5.9)2024-02 · +4.4 pts (90% band +2.3 to +5.9)2024-03 · +4.4 pts (90% band +2.4 to +6.0)2024-04 · +4.4 pts (90% band +2.4 to +6.0)2024-05 · +4.5 pts (90% band +2.5 to +6.0)2024-06 · +4.5 pts (90% band +2.6 to +6.0)2024-07 · +4.5 pts (90% band +2.6 to +6.0)2024-08 · +4.6 pts (90% band +2.7 to +6.0)2024-09 · +4.6 pts (90% band +2.8 to +6.0)2024-10 · +4.6 pts (90% band +2.8 to +6.0)2024-11 · +4.7 pts (90% band +2.9 to +6.0)2024-12 · +4.7 pts (90% band +3.0 to +6.0)2025-01 · +4.7 pts (90% band +3.0 to +6.1)2025-02 · +4.8 pts (90% band +3.1 to +6.1)2025-03 · +4.8 pts (90% band +3.2 to +6.1)2025-04 · +4.8 pts (90% band +3.3 to +6.1)2025-05 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.4 to +6.1)2025-06 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.4 to +6.1)2025-07 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.5 to +6.1)2025-08 · +5.0 pts (90% band +3.6 to +6.1)2025-09 · +5.0 pts (90% band +3.6 to +6.1)2025-10 · +5.1 pts (90% band +3.7 to +6.2)2025-11 · +5.1 pts (90% band +3.8 to +6.2)2025-12 · +5.2 pts (90% band +3.9 to +6.3)2026-01 · +5.2 pts (90% band +3.9 to +6.3)2026-02 · +5.2 pts (90% band +3.9 to +6.4)2026-03 · +5.3 pts (90% band +3.8 to +6.4)2026-04 · +5.3 pts (90% band +3.8 to +6.4)2026-05 · +5.3 pts (90% band +3.8 to +6.5)2026-06 · +5.3 pts (90% band +3.8 to +6.5)2026-07 · +5.3 pts (90% band +3.8 to +6.5)2026-08 · +5.3 pts (90% band +3.8 to +6.5)2026-09 · +5.4 pts (90% band +3.8 to +6.6)2026-10 · +5.4 pts (90% band +3.8 to +6.6)+2+4+6202420252026pts vs avg pairing

Game log vs expectation

Dots = share of points actually won in each game; line = what the model expected given both pairings that month (weakest-link included; descriptive, not a frozen forecast).

2025-08-21 PPA · 11-3 · vs Đức/T · w/ Quan Do · model expected 70% of points2025-08-21 PPA · 11-2 · vs Đức/T · w/ Quan Do · model expected 70% of points2025-08-21 PPA · 11-0 · vs Chen/Hsiang · w/ Quan Do · model expected 87% of points2025-08-21 PPA · 11-0 · vs Chen/Hsiang · w/ Quan Do · model expected 87% of points2025-08-23 PPA · 8-11 · vs Kim/Wong · w/ Quan Do · model expected 55% of points2025-08-23 PPA · 4-11 · vs Kim/Wong · w/ Quan Do · model expected 55% of points2025-09-06 PPA · 11-6 · vs Brown/Chen-An · w/ Quan Do · model expected 70% of points2025-09-06 PPA · 11-0 · vs Brown/Chen-An · w/ Quan Do · model expected 70% of points2025-09-06 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Koller/Truong · w/ Quan Do · model expected 51% of points2025-09-06 PPA · 1-11 · vs Koller/Truong · w/ Quan Do · model expected 51% of points2025-09-24 PPA · 11-9 · vs Lam/Hoan · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 64% of points2025-09-24 PPA · 11-5 · vs Lam/Hoan · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 64% of points2025-09-24 PPA · 11-8 · vs Kao/Kim · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 50% of points2025-09-24 PPA · 11-5 · vs Kao/Kim · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 50% of points2025-09-25 PPA · 0-11 · vs Johns/Alshon · w/ Quan Do · model expected 32% of points2025-09-25 PPA · 11-9 · vs Johns/Alshon · w/ Quan Do · model expected 32% of points2025-09-25 PPA · 8-11 · vs Johns/Alshon · w/ Quan Do · model expected 32% of points2025-09-25 PPA · 4-11 · vs Tam/Wong · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 51% of points2025-09-25 PPA · 7-11 · vs Tam/Wong · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 51% of points2025-09-25 PPA · 11-8 · vs Narayanan/Stirling · w/ Quan Do · model expected 56% of points2025-09-25 PPA · 11-9 · vs Narayanan/Stirling · w/ Quan Do · model expected 56% of points2025-09-30 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Miyoshi/Dennehy · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 45% of points2025-09-30 PPA · 5-11 · vs Miyoshi/Dennehy · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 45% of points2025-09-30 PPA · 2-11 · vs Miyoshi/Dennehy · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 45% of points2025-09-30 PPA · 11-0 · vs Rubio/Toi · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 76% of points2025-09-30 PPA · 11-3 · vs Rubio/Toi · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 76% of points2025-10-01 PPA · 1-11 · vs Johns/Bar · w/ Quan Do · model expected 38% of points2025-10-01 PPA · 8-11 · vs Johns/Bar · w/ Quan Do · model expected 38% of points2025-10-01 PPA · 11-5 · vs Dawson/Grewal · w/ Quan Do · model expected 65% of points2025-10-01 PPA · 4-11 · vs Dawson/Grewal · w/ Quan Do · model expected 65% of points2025-10-01 PPA · 11-4 · vs Dawson/Grewal · w/ Quan Do · model expected 65% of points2025-12-03 PPA · 11-6 · vs Sr/Anh · w/ Quan Do · model expected 79% of points2025-12-03 PPA · 11-2 · vs Sr/Anh · w/ Quan Do · model expected 79% of points2025-12-03 PPA · 11-5 · vs Wang-Beckvall/Đức · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 50% of points2025-12-03 PPA · 11-9 · vs Wang-Beckvall/Đức · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 50% of points2025-12-04 PPA · 11-6 · vs Hovenier/Garnett · w/ Quan Do · model expected 46% of points2025-12-04 PPA · 11-2 · vs Hovenier/Garnett · w/ Quan Do · model expected 46% of points2025-12-04 PPA · 8-11 · vs Dennehy/Stirling · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 39% of points2025-12-04 PPA · 4-11 · vs Dennehy/Stirling · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 39% of points2025-12-04 PPA · 8-11 · vs Bhatia/Raja · w/ Quan Do · model expected 63% of points2025-12-04 PPA · 11-7 · vs Bhatia/Raja · w/ Quan Do · model expected 63% of points2025-12-04 PPA · 11-7 · vs Bhatia/Raja · w/ Quan Do · model expected 63% of points2025-12-05 PPA · 11-3 · vs Shimabukuro/Haas · w/ Quan Do · model expected 62% of points2025-12-05 PPA · 11-4 · vs Shimabukuro/Haas · w/ Quan Do · model expected 62% of points2025-12-06 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Staksrud/Bhatia · w/ Quan Do · model expected 44% of points2025-12-06 PPA · 11-6 · vs Staksrud/Bhatia · w/ Quan Do · model expected 44% of points2025-12-06 PPA · 11-5 · vs Staksrud/Bhatia · w/ Quan Do · model expected 44% of points2026-09-28 PPA · 11-6 · vs Jacobson/Goodwin · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 74% of points2026-09-28 PPA · 11-3 · vs Jacobson/Goodwin · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 74% of points2026-09-28 PPA · 11-3 · vs Stanchev/Ampon · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 58% of points2026-09-28 PPA · 6-11 · vs Stanchev/Ampon · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 58% of points2026-09-28 PPA · 11-1 · vs Stanchev/Ampon · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 58% of points2026-09-28 PPA · 11-6 · vs Champine/Flippin · w/ Quan Do · model expected 70% of points2026-09-28 PPA · 11-6 · vs Champine/Flippin · w/ Quan Do · model expected 70% of points2026-09-28 PPA · 11-2 · vs Rand/Morisette · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 67% of points2026-09-28 PPA · 11-5 · vs Rand/Morisette · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 67% of points2026-09-29 PPA · 11-0 · vs Fowler/Smith · w/ Quan Do · model expected 74% of points2026-09-29 PPA · 11-0 · vs Fowler/Smith · w/ Quan Do · model expected 74% of points2026-09-30 PPA · 11-6 · vs Powell/Hewett · w/ Quan Do · model expected 53% of points2026-09-30 PPA · 5-11 · vs Powell/Hewett · w/ Quan Do · model expected 53% of points2026-09-30 PPA · 3-11 · vs Powell/Hewett · w/ Quan Do · model expected 53% of points2026-09-30 PPA · 9-11 · vs Yang/Jones · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 43% of points2026-09-30 PPA · 9-11 · vs Yang/Jones · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh · model expected 43% of points2026-10-14 PPA · 11-0 · vs ?/Burr · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh2026-10-14 PPA · 11-5 · vs ?/Burr · w/ Sophia Nhi Huynh0%25%50%75%100%20252026winlossmodel expectationshare of points

Splits

yeartourW–L win%avg score
2025PPA30–1764%9.0–7.2
2026PPA13–572%9.7–5.4
4–3
deciding games (PPA winner-take-all)
1–2
overtime games (past the target)
26
blowout wins (opponents ≤5)
8
longest win streak
+2
current streak (+W / −L)

Singles

+5.1 (+4.1…+5.9)
pts vs avg active men’s singles player (90%)
rated
59 pro singles games
36–23
singles record · last 2026-10

Full singles ratings →

Partners

Chemistry = pair effect beyond the two players' values, in points per game; almost everything here is honest noise — no pair in the sport clears statistical significance (why).

partnergames W–Lpoint sharechem (pts)
Quan Do3926–1358%+0.10 ±0.50 (noise)
Sophia Nhi Huynh2617–958%+0.03 ±0.50 (noise)

Recent games

datetourpartner opponentsscorevs exp
2026-10-14PPA · mixedSophia Nhi Huynh?/Burr11-5—
2026-10-14PPA · mixedSophia Nhi Huynh?/Burr11-0—
2026-09-30PPA · mixedSophia Nhi HuynhYang/Jones9-11+2%
2026-09-30PPA · mixedSophia Nhi HuynhYang/Jones9-11+2%
2026-09-30PPA · mensQuan DoPowell/Hewett3-11-31%
2026-09-30PPA · mensQuan DoPowell/Hewett5-11-21%
2026-09-30PPA · mensQuan DoPowell/Hewett11-6+12%
2026-09-29PPA · mensQuan DoFowler/Smith11-0+26%
2026-09-29PPA · mensQuan DoFowler/Smith11-0+26%
2026-09-28PPA · mixedSophia Nhi HuynhRand/Morisette11-5+2%
2026-09-28PPA · mixedSophia Nhi HuynhRand/Morisette11-2+18%
2026-09-28PPA · mensQuan DoChampine/Flippin11-6-5%

Put Hien in the simulator →