Evie Kenna W
womens 25–19 · mixed 11–15
+2.3 (+0.6…+3.7)
pts vs avg pairing (90% interval)
#131
of 204 active women (within gender only)
36–34
career record · 51% wins, 51% of points
Skill trajectory
Monthly posterior value (converted to points vs an average
pairing) with a 90% credible band. Flat months = little evidence, not zero
games.
2024-01 · +1.1 pts (90% band -1.5 to +3.2) 2024-02 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.4 to +3.2) 2024-03 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.4 to +3.2) 2024-04 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.3 to +3.2) 2024-05 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.2 to +3.2) 2024-06 · +1.3 pts (90% band -1.2 to +3.2) 2024-07 · +1.3 pts (90% band -1.1 to +3.2) 2024-08 · +1.3 pts (90% band -1.0 to +3.2) 2024-09 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.9 to +3.1) 2024-10 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.8 to +3.1) 2024-11 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.7 to +3.1) 2024-12 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.6 to +3.2) 2025-01 · +1.5 pts (90% band -0.5 to +3.2) 2025-02 · +1.5 pts (90% band -0.4 to +3.2) 2025-03 · +1.6 pts (90% band -0.2 to +3.2) 2025-04 · +1.6 pts (90% band -0.1 to +3.2) 2025-05 · +1.6 pts (90% band -0.1 to +3.2) 2025-06 · +1.7 pts (90% band -0.0 to +3.2) 2025-07 · +1.7 pts (90% band +0.1 to +3.2) 2025-08 · +1.7 pts (90% band +0.1 to +3.2) 2025-09 · +1.8 pts (90% band +0.2 to +3.2) 2025-10 · +1.8 pts (90% band +0.3 to +3.2) 2025-11 · +1.8 pts (90% band +0.4 to +3.2) 2025-12 · +1.9 pts (90% band +0.5 to +3.2) 2026-01 · +2.0 pts (90% band +0.6 to +3.2) 2026-02 · +2.0 pts (90% band +0.7 to +3.3) 2026-03 · +2.1 pts (90% band +0.7 to +3.3) 2026-04 · +2.1 pts (90% band +0.8 to +3.4) 2026-05 · +2.2 pts (90% band +0.9 to +3.4) 2026-06 · +2.2 pts (90% band +0.9 to +3.5) 2026-07 · +2.3 pts (90% band +0.9 to +3.6) 2026-08 · +2.3 pts (90% band +0.8 to +3.6) 2026-09 · +2.3 pts (90% band +0.7 to +3.7) 2026-10 · +2.3 pts (90% band +0.6 to +3.7) +0 +2 +4 2024 2025 2026 pts vs avg pairing
Game log vs expectation
Dots = share of points actually won in each game; line = what
the model expected given both pairings that month (weakest-link included;
descriptive, not a frozen forecast).
2024-04-01 PPA · 1-11 · vs Kodali/Safdar · w/ Skylor Riley · model expected 38% of points 2024-04-01 PPA · 8-11 · vs Kodali/Safdar · w/ Skylor Riley · model expected 38% of points 2024-04-03 PPA · 3-11 · vs David/Schneemann · w/ Jessica Haywood · model expected 20% of points 2024-04-03 PPA · 2-11 · vs David/Schneemann · w/ Jessica Haywood · model expected 20% of points 2024-11-04 PPA · 11-4 · vs Ruhl/Garcia · w/ Daniel Byun · model expected 52% of points 2024-11-04 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Ruhl/Garcia · w/ Daniel Byun · model expected 52% of points 2024-11-04 PPA · 5-11 · vs Ray/Landgraf · w/ Daniel Byun · model expected 56% of points 2024-11-04 PPA · 6-11 · vs Ray/Landgraf · w/ Daniel Byun · model expected 56% of points 2025-04-04 PPA · 9-11 · vs Haywood/Safdar · w/ Kayla Nesbitt · model expected 44% of points 2025-04-04 PPA · 11-7 · vs Haywood/Safdar · w/ Kayla Nesbitt · model expected 44% of points 2025-04-04 PPA · 8-11 · vs Haywood/Safdar · w/ Kayla Nesbitt · model expected 44% of points 2025-04-04 PPA · 9-11 · vs Geut/Godwin · w/ Kayla Nesbitt · model expected 63% of points 2025-04-04 PPA · 11-5 · vs Geut/Godwin · w/ Kayla Nesbitt · model expected 63% of points 2025-04-04 PPA · 11-6 · vs Geut/Godwin · w/ Kayla Nesbitt · model expected 63% of points 2025-12-13 PPA · 11-3 · vs Lutz/Stanciu · w/ Karolina Fleming · model expected 49% of points 2025-12-13 PPA · 11-9 · vs Lutz/Stanciu · w/ Karolina Fleming · model expected 49% of points 2025-12-13 PPA · 5-11 · vs Kunimoto/Yeh · w/ Karolina Fleming · model expected 29% of points 2025-12-13 PPA · 4-11 · vs Kunimoto/Yeh · w/ Karolina Fleming · model expected 29% of points 2025-12-14 PPA · 7-15 · vs Liang/Aldridge · w/ Karolina Fleming · model expected 47% of points 2025-12-14 PPA · 15-3 · vs Smith/Medina · w/ Andrew Wang · model expected 63% of points 2025-12-14 PPA · 3-11 · vs Petropouleas/Gordon · w/ Andrew Wang · model expected 50% of points 2025-12-14 PPA · 5-11 · vs Petropouleas/Gordon · w/ Andrew Wang · model expected 50% of points 2025-12-14 PPA · 4-15 · vs Haywood/Giannelli · w/ Andrew Wang · model expected 43% of points 2026-02-09 PPA · 11-6 · vs Grgan/Ferguson · w/ Rachael James · model expected 60% of points 2026-02-09 PPA · 11-8 · vs Grgan/Ferguson · w/ Rachael James · model expected 60% of points 2026-02-09 PPA · 9-11 · vs Mody/Ulery · w/ Andrew Angulo · model expected 47% of points 2026-02-09 PPA · 6-11 · vs Mody/Ulery · w/ Andrew Angulo · model expected 47% of points 2026-02-09 PPA · 11-1 · vs Turcsany/Godwin · w/ Rachael James · model expected 72% of points 2026-02-09 PPA · 11-7 · vs Turcsany/Godwin · w/ Rachael James · model expected 72% of points 2026-02-09 PPA · 11-3 · vs Heysek/Leon · w/ Andrew Angulo · model expected 63% of points 2026-02-09 PPA · 11-7 · vs Heysek/Leon · w/ Andrew Angulo · model expected 63% of points 2026-02-10 PPA · 11-7 · vs Hendershot/Minniefield · w/ Rachael James · model expected 53% of points 2026-02-10 PPA · 11-5 · vs Hendershot/Minniefield · w/ Rachael James · model expected 53% of points 2026-02-10 PPA · 6-11 · vs Simon/Nemoff · w/ Andrew Angulo · model expected 55% of points 2026-02-10 PPA · 7-11 · vs Simon/Nemoff · w/ Andrew Angulo · model expected 55% of points 2026-02-11 PPA · 8-11 · vs Wang/Buckner · w/ Rachael James · model expected 30% of points 2026-02-11 PPA · 6-11 · vs Wang/Buckner · w/ Rachael James · model expected 30% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 5-11 · vs Stratman/Koop · w/ Rachael James · model expected 39% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 5-11 · vs Stratman/Koop · w/ Rachael James · model expected 39% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 11-4 · vs Grgan/Ferguson · w/ Rachael James · model expected 59% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 11-7 · vs Grgan/Ferguson · w/ Rachael James · model expected 59% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 11-7 · vs Kim/Pisacrita · w/ Rachael James · model expected 60% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 6-11 · vs Kim/Pisacrita · w/ Rachael James · model expected 60% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 11-2 · vs Kim/Pisacrita · w/ Rachael James · model expected 60% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 4-15 · vs Policare/To · w/ Rachael James · model expected 49% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 9-11 · vs Safdar/Imparato · w/ Rachael James · model expected 50% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 11-4 · vs Safdar/Imparato · w/ Rachael James · model expected 50% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 11-3 · vs Safdar/Imparato · w/ Rachael James · model expected 50% of points 2026-05-24 PPA · 11-6 · vs Grgan/Woog · w/ Dale Kim · model expected 50% of points 2026-05-24 PPA · 11-2 · vs Grgan/Woog · w/ Dale Kim · model expected 50% of points 2026-05-24 PPA · 15-1 · vs Pooley/Rios · w/ Dale Kim · model expected 78% of points 2026-05-24 PPA · 15-13 · vs Varon/Wynne · w/ Dale Kim · model expected 51% of points 2026-05-24 PPA · 11-6 · vs Khan/Arnold · w/ Dale Kim · model expected 45% of points 2026-05-24 PPA · 2-11 · vs Khan/Arnold · w/ Dale Kim · model expected 45% of points 2026-05-24 PPA · 5-11 · vs Khan/Arnold · w/ Dale Kim · model expected 45% of points 2026-05-24 PPA · 4-15 · vs Ulery/Anderson · w/ Dale Kim · model expected 55% of points 2026-07-25 PPA · 11-4 · vs Sonda/Baldi · w/ Marina Sicic · model expected 82% of points 2026-07-25 PPA · 11-0 · vs Sonda/Baldi · w/ Marina Sicic · model expected 82% of points 2026-07-25 PPA · 3-11 · vs Romero/Morris · w/ Marina Sicic · model expected 47% of points 2026-07-25 PPA · 7-11 · vs Romero/Morris · w/ Marina Sicic · model expected 47% of points 2026-07-25 PPA · 15-1 · vs Enmer/Peltier · w/ Theo Platel · model expected 66% of points 2026-07-25 PPA · 15-17 (OT) · vs Romero/Morris · w/ Marina Sicic · model expected 47% of points 2026-07-25 PPA · 11-1 · vs Romero/Morris · w/ Marina Sicic · model expected 47% of points 2026-07-25 PPA · 11-8 · vs Romero/Morris · w/ Marina Sicic · model expected 47% of points 2026-07-25 PPA · 13-15 · vs Ling/Tomkinson · w/ Theo Platel · model expected 51% of points 2026-07-25 PPA · 6-11 · vs Donatoni/McMillan · w/ Marina Sicic · model expected 47% of points 2026-07-25 PPA · 11-9 · vs Donatoni/McMillan · w/ Marina Sicic · model expected 47% of points 2026-07-25 PPA · 11-9 · vs Donatoni/McMillan · w/ Marina Sicic · model expected 47% of points 2026-07-25 PPA · 11-4 · vs Kanichova/Grgan · w/ Marina Sicic · model expected 62% of points 2026-07-25 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Kanichova/Grgan · w/ Marina Sicic · model expected 62% of points 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2024 2025 2026 win loss model expectation share of points
Splits
year tour W–L
win% avg score 2024 PPA 2–6 25% 6.0–10.0 2025 PPA 6–9 40% 8.3–9.3 2026 PPA 28–19 60% 9.5–7.9
4–2
deciding games (PPA winner-take-all)
2–1
overtime games (past the target)
15
blowout wins (opponents ≤5)
+4
current streak (+W / −L)
Singles
-3.2 (-6.9…+2.4)
pts vs avg active women’s singles player (90%)
projected
no singles record — projected from doubles, selection-corrected
Full singles ratings →
Partners
Chemistry = pair effect beyond the two players' values, in
points per game; almost everything here is honest noise — no pair in the
sport clears statistical significance (why ).
partner games
W–L point share chem (pts)
Rachael James 19 12–7 55% +0.07 ±0.49 (noise) Marina Sicic 12 8–4 56% +0.04 ±0.48 (noise) Dale Kim 8 5–3 53% +0.03 ±0.50 (noise) Kayla Nesbitt 6 3–3 54% +0.01 ±0.49 (noise) Andrew Angulo 6 2–4 48% -0.08 ±0.50 (noise) Karolina Fleming 5 2–3 44% +0.04 ±0.50 (noise) Daniel Byun 4 2–2 49% -0.04 ±0.50 (noise) Andrew Wang 4 1–3 40% -0.09 ±0.50 (noise) Skylor Riley 2 0–2 29% -0.05 ±0.51 (noise) Jessica Haywood 2 0–2 19% -0.00 ±0.50 (noise) Theo Platel 2 1–1 64% +0.08 ±0.51 (noise)
Recent games
date tour partner
opponents score vs exp
2026-07-25 PPA · womens Marina Sicic Kanichova/Grgan 12-10 OT-8% 2026-07-25 PPA · womens Marina Sicic Kanichova/Grgan 11-4 +11% 2026-07-25 PPA · womens Marina Sicic Donatoni/McMillan 11-9 +8% 2026-07-25 PPA · womens Marina Sicic Donatoni/McMillan 11-9 +8% 2026-07-25 PPA · womens Marina Sicic Donatoni/McMillan 6-11 -12% 2026-07-25 PPA · mixed Theo Platel Ling/Tomkinson 13-15 -5% 2026-07-25 PPA · womens Marina Sicic Romero/Morris 11-8 +11% 2026-07-25 PPA · womens Marina Sicic Romero/Morris 11-1 +45% 2026-07-25 PPA · womens Marina Sicic Romero/Morris 15-17 OT -0% 2026-07-25 PPA · mixed Theo Platel Enmer/Peltier 15-1 +27% 2026-07-25 PPA · womens Marina Sicic Romero/Morris 7-11 -8% 2026-07-25 PPA · womens Marina Sicic Romero/Morris 3-11 -25%
Put Evie in the simulator →
Unofficial fan analytics based on public results data —
not affiliated with any tour. Every number that has an error bar shows it;
cross-gender rankings are never published as fact (why ).
Model: Bayesian, 36k games, validated 77.4% winner accuracy on 884 unseen
games · data through 2026-10-15.