Keaten Kappes M
mens 25–28 · mixed 11–25
+1.4 (-1.0…+3.3)
pts vs avg pairing (90% interval)
#238
of 286 active men (within gender only)
36–53
career record · 40% wins, 46% of points
Skill trajectory
Monthly posterior value (converted to points vs an average
pairing) with a 90% credible band. Flat months = little evidence, not zero
games.
2024-01 · +0.7 pts (90% band -2.1 to +2.8) 2024-02 · +0.7 pts (90% band -2.0 to +2.8) 2024-03 · +0.7 pts (90% band -2.0 to +2.7) 2024-04 · +0.8 pts (90% band -1.8 to +2.7) 2024-05 · +0.8 pts (90% band -1.8 to +2.7) 2024-06 · +0.8 pts (90% band -1.7 to +2.6) 2024-07 · +0.8 pts (90% band -1.6 to +2.6) 2024-08 · +0.9 pts (90% band -1.4 to +2.6) 2024-09 · +0.9 pts (90% band -1.2 to +2.6) 2024-10 · +1.0 pts (90% band -1.1 to +2.6) 2024-11 · +1.1 pts (90% band -0.9 to +2.7) 2024-12 · +1.1 pts (90% band -0.8 to +2.7) 2025-01 · +1.2 pts (90% band -0.7 to +2.7) 2025-02 · +1.2 pts (90% band -0.6 to +2.8) 2025-03 · +1.2 pts (90% band -0.5 to +2.8) 2025-04 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.5 to +2.8) 2025-05 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.5 to +2.8) 2025-06 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.4 to +2.8) 2025-07 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.3 to +2.8) 2025-08 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.2 to +2.8) 2025-09 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.2 to +2.8) 2025-10 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.1 to +2.8) 2025-11 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.2 to +2.7) 2025-12 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.3 to +2.7) 2026-01 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.3 to +2.7) 2026-02 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.4 to +2.7) 2026-03 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.4 to +2.8) 2026-04 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.4 to +2.9) 2026-05 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.4 to +2.9) 2026-06 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.6 to +3.0) 2026-07 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.7 to +3.1) 2026-08 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.8 to +3.2) 2026-09 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.9 to +3.2) 2026-10 · +1.4 pts (90% band -1.0 to +3.3) -2 +0 +2 2024 2025 2026 pts vs avg pairing
Game log vs expectation
Dots = share of points actually won in each game; line = what
the model expected given both pairings that month (weakest-link included;
descriptive, not a frozen forecast).
2024-06-24 PPA · 2-11 · vs Pham/Whittaker · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 32% of points 2024-06-24 PPA · 0-11 · vs Pham/Whittaker · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 32% of points 2024-08-21 PPA · 6-11 · vs Deza/Boydston · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 46% of points 2024-08-21 PPA · 6-11 · vs Deza/Boydston · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 46% of points 2024-11-04 PPA · 5-11 · vs Gonnering/Policare · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 39% of points 2024-11-04 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Gonnering/Policare · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 39% of points 2024-11-05 PPA · 2-11 · vs Rosa/Emmrich · w/ Oliver Frank · model expected 35% of points 2024-11-05 PPA · 2-11 · vs Rosa/Emmrich · w/ Oliver Frank · model expected 35% of points 2024-11-05 PPA · 11-3 · vs Morris/Ray · w/ Oliver Frank · model expected 56% of points 2024-11-05 PPA · 7-11 · vs Morris/Ray · w/ Oliver Frank · model expected 56% of points 2024-11-05 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Morris/Ray · w/ Oliver Frank · model expected 56% of points 2024-11-05 PPA · 11-3 · vs Goins/Crouch · w/ Oliver Frank · model expected 45% of points 2024-11-05 PPA · 11-7 · vs Goins/Crouch · w/ Oliver Frank · model expected 45% of points 2024-11-05 PPA · 2-11 · vs Broker/Green · w/ Oliver Frank · model expected 50% of points 2024-11-05 PPA · 11-3 · vs Broker/Green · w/ Oliver Frank · model expected 50% of points 2024-11-05 PPA · 13-11 (OT) · vs Broker/Green · w/ Oliver Frank · model expected 50% of points 2025-02-17 PPA · 11-0 · vs Berryman/Harshman · w/ Zach Drost · model expected 71% of points 2025-02-17 PPA · 11-2 · vs Berryman/Harshman · w/ Zach Drost · model expected 71% of points 2025-02-17 PPA · 3-11 · vs Koszuta/Chrysostom · w/ Zach Drost · model expected 39% of points 2025-02-17 PPA · 9-11 · vs Koszuta/Chrysostom · w/ Zach Drost · model expected 39% of points 2025-02-17 PPA · 13-11 (OT) · vs Mead/Garza · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 52% of points 2025-02-17 PPA · 8-11 · vs Mead/Garza · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 52% of points 2025-02-17 PPA · 8-11 · vs Mead/Garza · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 52% of points 2025-08-27 PPA · 11-9 · vs Cosma/Mercado · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 41% of points 2025-08-27 PPA · 3-11 · vs Cosma/Mercado · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 41% of points 2025-08-27 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Cosma/Mercado · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 41% of points 2025-08-27 PPA · 11-3 · vs Phillips/Thorn · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 52% of points 2025-08-27 PPA · 11-6 · vs Phillips/Thorn · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 52% of points 2025-08-27 PPA · 2-11 · vs Wan/Byun · w/ Tam Nong · model expected 36% of points 2025-08-27 PPA · 5-11 · vs Wan/Byun · w/ Tam Nong · model expected 36% of points 2025-08-29 PPA · 4-11 · vs Rane/Bellamy · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 20% of points 2025-08-29 PPA · 2-11 · vs Rane/Bellamy · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 20% of points 2025-10-11 PPA · 5-15 · vs Steiner/Frank · w/ Jeffrey Moulton · model expected 25% of points 2025-10-11 PPA · 6-11 · vs Almeida/Seagraves · w/ Jeffrey Moulton · model expected 36% of points 2025-10-11 PPA · 8-11 · vs Almeida/Seagraves · w/ Jeffrey Moulton · model expected 36% of points 2025-10-11 PPA · 15-11 · vs Torres/Hart · w/ Jeffrey Moulton · model expected 65% of points 2025-10-20 PPA · 11-2 · vs Witten/Borov · w/ Zach Drost · model expected 68% of points 2025-10-20 PPA · 11-3 · vs Witten/Borov · w/ Zach Drost · model expected 68% of points 2025-10-20 PPA · 7-11 · vs Raugust/Morris · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 31% of points 2025-10-20 PPA · 11-8 · vs Raugust/Morris · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 31% of points 2025-10-20 PPA · 8-11 · vs Raugust/Morris · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 31% of points 2025-10-20 PPA · 11-6 · vs Wang/Tabatabaeian · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 56% of points 2025-10-20 PPA · 11-6 · vs Wang/Tabatabaeian · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 56% of points 2025-10-20 PPA · 5-11 · vs Nsekpong/Bricker · w/ Zach Drost · model expected 39% of points 2025-10-20 PPA · 11-4 · vs Nsekpong/Bricker · w/ Zach Drost · model expected 39% of points 2025-10-20 PPA · 11-7 · vs Nsekpong/Bricker · w/ Zach Drost · model expected 39% of points 2025-10-21 PPA · 2-11 · vs Trinh/Young · w/ Zach Drost · model expected 32% of points 2025-10-21 PPA · 1-11 · vs Trinh/Young · w/ Zach Drost · model expected 32% of points 2025-10-21 PPA · 0-11 · vs Hewett/Weil · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 22% of points 2025-10-21 PPA · 1-11 · vs Hewett/Weil · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 22% of points 2025-11-03 PPA · 6-11 · vs Rangelov/Grewal · w/ James Seagraves · model expected 47% of points 2025-11-03 PPA · 13-11 (OT) · vs Rangelov/Grewal · w/ James Seagraves · model expected 47% of points 2025-11-03 PPA · 7-11 · vs Rangelov/Grewal · w/ James Seagraves · model expected 47% of points 2025-11-03 PPA · 5-11 · vs IV/Mawji · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 44% of points 2025-11-03 PPA · 6-11 · vs IV/Mawji · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 44% of points 2025-11-03 PPA · 11-5 · vs Howard/Bunch · w/ James Seagraves · model expected 63% of points 2025-11-03 PPA · 11-7 · vs Howard/Bunch · w/ James Seagraves · model expected 63% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 8-11 · vs Luqur/Kaoma · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 33% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 2-11 · vs Luqur/Kaoma · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 33% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 11-6 · vs Roderick/Mulenga · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 57% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 11-2 · vs Roderick/Mulenga · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 57% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 2-11 · vs Lam/Kaoma · w/ Brayden Nguyen · model expected 46% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 16-14 (OT) · vs Lam/Kaoma · w/ Brayden Nguyen · model expected 46% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 11-3 · vs Lam/Kaoma · w/ Brayden Nguyen · model expected 46% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 9-11 · vs Whipple/Eveloff · w/ Brayden Nguyen · model expected 63% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 11-2 · vs Whipple/Eveloff · w/ Brayden Nguyen · model expected 63% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 11-0 · vs Whipple/Eveloff · w/ Brayden Nguyen · model expected 63% of points 2026-02-17 PPA · 3-11 · vs Angelo/Newcombe · w/ Brayden Nguyen · model expected 36% of points 2026-02-17 PPA · 7-11 · vs Angelo/Newcombe · w/ Brayden Nguyen · model expected 36% of points 2026-02-17 PPA · 5-11 · vs Hatton/Whittaker · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 30% of points 2026-02-17 PPA · 0-11 · vs Hatton/Whittaker · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 30% of points 2026-02-18 PPA · 3-11 · vs Johnson/Johns · w/ Brayden Nguyen · model expected 28% of points 2026-02-18 PPA · 5-11 · vs Johnson/Johns · w/ Brayden Nguyen · model expected 28% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 7-15 · vs Alto/Kim · w/ Arnav Duarah · model expected 50% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 2-11 · vs Duffin/Wade · w/ Arnav Duarah · model expected 41% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 6-11 · vs Duffin/Wade · w/ Arnav Duarah · model expected 41% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 15-13 · vs Lau/Orellana · w/ Arnav Duarah · model expected 71% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 15-5 · vs Conley/Shimizu · w/ Arnav Duarah · model expected 84% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 15-7 · vs Everhart/Kurki · w/ Arnav Duarah · model expected 63% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 2-11 · vs Gomez/Traxler · w/ Arnav Duarah · model expected 46% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 11-7 · vs Gomez/Traxler · w/ Arnav Duarah · model expected 46% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 8-11 · vs Gomez/Traxler · w/ Arnav Duarah · model expected 46% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 15-11 · vs Wasson/Mino · w/ Arnav Duarah · model expected 55% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 12-15 · vs Long/Hernandez · w/ Arnav Duarah · model expected 49% of points 2026-05-31 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Koszuta/Nguyen · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 26% of points 2026-05-31 PPA · 4-11 · vs Koszuta/Nguyen · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 26% of points 2026-05-31 PPA · 9-15 · vs Daniel/Sakkas · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 46% of points 2026-05-31 PPA · 11-9 · vs Gomez/Carr · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 48% of points 2026-05-31 PPA · 11-2 · vs Gomez/Carr · w/ Tomoko Taniguchi · model expected 48% of points 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2024 2025 2026 win loss model expectation share of points
Splits
year tour W–L
win% avg score 2024 PPA 6–10 38% 6.9–9.2 2025 PPA 17–24 41% 7.7–9.0 2026 PPA 13–19 41% 8.4–9.5
5–5
deciding games (PPA winner-take-all)
5–3
overtime games (past the target)
15
blowout wins (opponents ≤5)
+2
current streak (+W / −L)
Singles
-0.8 (-2.5…+1.1)
pts vs avg active men’s singles player (90%)
rated
33 pro singles games
14–19
singles record · last 2026-05
Full singles ratings →
Partners
Chemistry = pair effect beyond the two players' values, in
points per game; almost everything here is honest noise — no pair in the
sport clears statistical significance (why ).
partner games
W–L point share chem (pts)
Tomoko Taniguchi 36 11–25 42% +0.04 ±0.48 (noise) Zach Drost 11 6–5 54% +0.16 ±0.50 (noise) Arnav Duarah 11 5–6 48% -0.19 ±0.52 (noise) Oliver Frank 10 6–4 50% +0.05 ±0.50 (noise) Brayden Nguyen 10 4–6 48% +0.08 ±0.48 (noise) James Seagraves 5 3–2 52% -0.02 ±0.51 (noise) Jeffrey Moulton 4 1–3 41% +0.00 ±0.50 (noise) Tam Nong 2 0–2 24% -0.05 ±0.49 (noise)
Recent games
date tour partner
opponents score vs exp
2026-05-31 PPA · mixed Tomoko Taniguchi Gomez/Carr 11-2 +37% 2026-05-31 PPA · mixed Tomoko Taniguchi Gomez/Carr 11-9 +7% 2026-05-31 PPA · mixed Tomoko Taniguchi Daniel/Sakkas 9-15 -9% 2026-05-31 PPA · mixed Tomoko Taniguchi Koszuta/Nguyen 4-11 +1% 2026-05-31 PPA · mixed Tomoko Taniguchi Koszuta/Nguyen 10-12 OT +20% 2026-05-30 PPA · mens Arnav Duarah Long/Hernandez 12-15 -4% 2026-05-30 PPA · mens Arnav Duarah Wasson/Mino 15-11 +3% 2026-05-30 PPA · mens Arnav Duarah Gomez/Traxler 8-11 -4% 2026-05-30 PPA · mens Arnav Duarah Gomez/Traxler 11-7 +15% 2026-05-30 PPA · mens Arnav Duarah Gomez/Traxler 2-11 -31% 2026-05-30 PPA · mens Arnav Duarah Everhart/Kurki 15-7 +5% 2026-05-30 PPA · mens Arnav Duarah Conley/Shimizu 15-5 -9%
Put Keaten in the simulator →
Unofficial fan analytics based on public results data —
not affiliated with any tour. Every number that has an error bar shows it;
cross-gender rankings are never published as fact (why ).
Model: Bayesian, 36k games, validated 77.4% winner accuracy on 884 unseen
games · data through 2026-10-15.