Charles Case M
mens 30–22 · mixed 2–7
+2.0 (-1.0…+4.3)
pts vs avg pairing (90% interval)
#219
of 286 active men (within gender only)
32–29
career record · 52% wins, 51% of points
Skill trajectory
Monthly posterior value (converted to points vs an average
pairing) with a 90% credible band. Flat months = little evidence, not zero
games.
2024-01 · +1.8 pts (90% band -0.3 to +3.5) 2024-02 · +1.8 pts (90% band -0.2 to +3.5) 2024-03 · +1.8 pts (90% band -0.1 to +3.5) 2024-04 · +1.8 pts (90% band +0.0 to +3.5) 2024-05 · +1.8 pts (90% band -0.0 to +3.4) 2024-06 · +1.8 pts (90% band -0.1 to +3.4) 2024-07 · +1.7 pts (90% band -0.2 to +3.4) 2024-08 · +1.7 pts (90% band -0.3 to +3.4) 2024-09 · +1.7 pts (90% band -0.4 to +3.4) 2024-10 · +1.7 pts (90% band -0.4 to +3.5) 2024-11 · +1.7 pts (90% band -0.3 to +3.5) 2024-12 · +1.8 pts (90% band -0.3 to +3.5) 2025-01 · +1.8 pts (90% band -0.2 to +3.6) 2025-02 · +1.8 pts (90% band -0.2 to +3.6) 2025-03 · +1.9 pts (90% band -0.1 to +3.6) 2025-04 · +1.9 pts (90% band -0.0 to +3.7) 2025-05 · +1.9 pts (90% band +0.0 to +3.7) 2025-06 · +2.0 pts (90% band +0.0 to +3.7) 2025-07 · +2.0 pts (90% band +0.0 to +3.7) 2025-08 · +2.0 pts (90% band -0.1 to +3.8) 2025-09 · +2.0 pts (90% band -0.1 to +3.8) 2025-10 · +2.0 pts (90% band -0.1 to +3.8) 2025-11 · +2.0 pts (90% band -0.2 to +3.8) 2025-12 · +2.0 pts (90% band -0.2 to +3.9) 2026-01 · +2.0 pts (90% band -0.3 to +3.9) 2026-02 · +2.0 pts (90% band -0.3 to +3.9) 2026-03 · +2.0 pts (90% band -0.3 to +3.9) 2026-04 · +2.0 pts (90% band -0.4 to +4.0) 2026-05 · +2.0 pts (90% band -0.5 to +4.0) 2026-06 · +2.0 pts (90% band -0.6 to +4.1) 2026-07 · +2.0 pts (90% band -0.7 to +4.1) 2026-08 · +2.0 pts (90% band -0.8 to +4.2) 2026-09 · +2.0 pts (90% band -0.9 to +4.2) 2026-10 · +2.0 pts (90% band -1.0 to +4.3) +0 +2 +4 2024 2025 2026 pts vs avg pairing
Game log vs expectation
Dots = share of points actually won in each game; line = what
the model expected given both pairings that month (weakest-link included;
descriptive, not a frozen forecast).
2024-04-24 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Jr/Fruttero · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 67% of points 2024-04-24 PPA · 11-1 · vs Jr/Fruttero · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 67% of points 2024-04-24 PPA · 11-2 · vs Holbrook/Bliss · w/ Maddy Rasmusen · model expected 66% of points 2024-04-24 PPA · 11-5 · vs Holbrook/Bliss · w/ Maddy Rasmusen · model expected 66% of points 2024-04-24 PPA · 3-11 · vs Haas/Haas · w/ Maddy Rasmusen · model expected 46% of points 2024-04-24 PPA · 8-11 · vs Haas/Haas · w/ Maddy Rasmusen · model expected 46% of points 2024-04-24 PPA · 11-3 · vs Vanderwarf/Williams · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 55% of points 2024-04-24 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Vanderwarf/Williams · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 55% of points 2024-04-24 PPA · 11-4 · vs Vanderwarf/Williams · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 55% of points 2024-04-27 PPA · 11-8 · vs Eveloff/Beasley · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 52% of points 2024-04-27 PPA · 11-5 · vs Eveloff/Beasley · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 52% of points 2024-04-27 PPA · 4-11 · vs Daescu/Tardio · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 23% of points 2024-04-27 PPA · 5-11 · vs Daescu/Tardio · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 23% of points 2024-06-24 PPA · 11-8 · vs Cartenuto/Troike · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 61% of points 2024-06-24 PPA · 11-1 · vs Cartenuto/Troike · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 61% of points 2024-06-25 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Wild/Jr · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 53% of points 2024-06-25 PPA · 9-11 · vs Wild/Jr · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 53% of points 2024-06-25 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Wild/Jr · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 53% of points 2024-08-21 PPA · 7-11 · vs Ferrer/Springfield · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 43% of points 2024-08-21 PPA · 11-9 · vs Ferrer/Springfield · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 43% of points 2024-08-21 PPA · 4-11 · vs Ferrer/Springfield · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 43% of points 2024-08-26 PPA · 8-11 · vs Rosenbach/Wold · w/ Dodo Kong · model expected 43% of points 2024-08-26 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Rosenbach/Wold · w/ Dodo Kong · model expected 43% of points 2024-08-27 PPA · 11-4 · vs Velarde/Jimenez · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 80% of points 2024-08-27 PPA · 11-0 · vs Velarde/Jimenez · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 80% of points 2024-08-27 PPA · 4-11 · vs Venkatesan/Quintero · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 58% of points 2024-08-27 PPA · 11-9 · vs Venkatesan/Quintero · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 58% of points 2024-08-27 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Venkatesan/Quintero · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 58% of points 2024-10-09 PPA · 11-2 · vs Dysert/Simms · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 61% of points 2024-10-09 PPA · 11-13 (OT) · vs Dysert/Simms · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 61% of points 2024-10-09 PPA · 11-3 · vs Dysert/Simms · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 61% of points 2024-10-09 PPA · 11-5 · vs Wong/Lam · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 58% of points 2024-10-09 PPA · 1-11 · vs Wong/Lam · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 58% of points 2024-10-09 PPA · 11-8 · vs Wong/Lam · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 58% of points 2024-10-10 PPA · 1-11 · vs Nahum/Afanasenka · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 53% of points 2024-10-10 PPA · 11-9 · vs Nahum/Afanasenka · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 53% of points 2024-10-10 PPA · 8-11 · vs Nahum/Afanasenka · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 53% of points 2025-05-31 PPA · 15-8 · vs Coutinho/Wade · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 52% of points 2025-05-31 PPA · 15-8 · vs Thul/Sarthak · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 51% of points 2025-05-31 PPA · 15-8 · vs Duffin/Boydston · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 53% of points 2025-05-31 PPA · 5-11 · vs Burkhardt/Bhargava · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 46% of points 2025-05-31 PPA · 11-6 · vs Burkhardt/Bhargava · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 46% of points 2025-05-31 PPA · 13-11 (OT) · vs Burkhardt/Bhargava · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 46% of points 2025-05-31 PPA · 11-13 (OT) · vs Edwards/Ortega · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 49% of points 2025-05-31 PPA · 3-11 · vs Edwards/Ortega · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 49% of points 2025-05-31 PPA · 3-11 · vs Delgado/Wasson · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 44% of points 2025-05-31 PPA · 11-8 · vs Delgado/Wasson · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 44% of points 2025-05-31 PPA · 7-11 · vs Delgado/Wasson · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 44% of points 2025-05-31 PPA · 8-11 · vs Heiner/Thorn · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 60% of points 2025-05-31 PPA · 11-9 · vs Heiner/Thorn · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 60% of points 2025-05-31 PPA · 11-4 · vs Heiner/Thorn · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 60% of points 2026-01-25 PPA · 7-15 · vs Poland/Nguyen · w/ Lily Goodwin · model expected 23% of points 2026-01-25 PPA · 2-11 · vs Vasvatekis/Radermacher · w/ Lily Goodwin · model expected 39% of points 2026-01-25 PPA · 3-11 · vs Vasvatekis/Radermacher · w/ Lily Goodwin · model expected 39% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 13-11 (OT) · vs Byun/Burkhardt · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 51% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 11-2 · vs Byun/Burkhardt · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 51% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 11-2 · vs Filardi/Morris · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 61% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 8-11 · vs Filardi/Morris · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 61% of points 2026-02-16 PPA · 11-6 · vs Filardi/Morris · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 61% of points 2026-02-17 PPA · 4-11 · vs Blaszkewycz/Yang · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 32% of points 2026-02-17 PPA · 3-11 · vs Blaszkewycz/Yang · w/ Ryan Smith · model expected 32% of points 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2024 2025 2026 win loss model expectation share of points
Splits
year tour W–L
win% avg score 2024 PPA 20–17 54% 9.1–8.1 2025 PPA 8–6 57% 9.9–9.3 2026 PPA 4–6 40% 7.3–9.1
6–5
deciding games (PPA winner-take-all)
4–6
overtime games (past the target)
15
blowout wins (opponents ≤5)
-2
current streak (+W / −L)
Singles
-2.7 (-6.7…+3.1)
pts vs avg active men’s singles player (90%)
projected
no singles record — projected from doubles, selection-corrected
Full singles ratings →
Partners
Chemistry = pair effect beyond the two players' values, in
points per game; almost everything here is honest noise — no pair in the
sport clears statistical significance (why ).
partner games
W–L point share chem (pts)
Ryan Smith 52 30–22 53% +0.09 ±0.52 (noise) Maddy Rasmusen 4 2–2 53% +0.00 ±0.53 (noise) Lily Goodwin 3 0–3 24% -0.05 ±0.50 (noise) Dodo Kong 2 0–2 44% +0.01 ±0.53 (noise)
Recent games
date tour partner
opponents score vs exp
2026-02-17 PPA · mens Ryan Smith Blaszkewycz/Yang 3-11 -10% 2026-02-17 PPA · mens Ryan Smith Blaszkewycz/Yang 4-11 -5% 2026-02-16 PPA · mens Ryan Smith Filardi/Morris 11-6 +4% 2026-02-16 PPA · mens Ryan Smith Filardi/Morris 8-11 -19% 2026-02-16 PPA · mens Ryan Smith Filardi/Morris 11-2 +24% 2026-02-16 PPA · mens Ryan Smith Byun/Burkhardt 11-2 +34% 2026-02-16 PPA · mens Ryan Smith Byun/Burkhardt 13-11 OT+4% 2026-01-25 PPA · mixed Lily Goodwin Vasvatekis/Radermacher 3-11 -17% 2026-01-25 PPA · mixed Lily Goodwin Vasvatekis/Radermacher 2-11 -24% 2026-01-25 PPA · mixed Lily Goodwin Poland/Nguyen 7-15 +9% 2025-05-31 PPA · mens Ryan Smith Heiner/Thorn 11-4 +13% 2025-05-31 PPA · mens Ryan Smith Heiner/Thorn 11-9 -5%
Put Charles in the simulator →
Unofficial fan analytics based on public results data —
not affiliated with any tour. Every number that has an error bar shows it;
cross-gender rankings are never published as fact (why ).
Model: Bayesian, 36k games, validated 77.4% winner accuracy on 884 unseen
games · data through 2026-10-14.