Sarah Jane Lim W
womens 11–16 · mixed 16–17
+0.7 (-2.2…+2.9)
pts vs avg pairing (90% interval)
—
of 204 active women (within gender only; no 2026 games)
27–33
career record · 45% wins, 48% of points
Skill trajectory
Monthly posterior value (converted to points vs an average
pairing) with a 90% credible band. Flat months = little evidence, not zero
games.
2024-01 · +1.1 pts (90% band -1.4 to +3.0) 2024-02 · +1.1 pts (90% band -1.3 to +3.0) 2024-03 · +1.1 pts (90% band -1.2 to +3.0) 2024-04 · +1.1 pts (90% band -1.2 to +3.0) 2024-05 · +1.1 pts (90% band -1.1 to +2.9) 2024-06 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.0 to +2.9) 2024-07 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.0 to +2.9) 2024-08 · +1.2 pts (90% band -0.9 to +2.8) 2024-09 · +1.2 pts (90% band -0.9 to +2.8) 2024-10 · +1.2 pts (90% band -0.8 to +2.8) 2024-11 · +1.2 pts (90% band -0.8 to +2.7) 2024-12 · +1.1 pts (90% band -0.8 to +2.7) 2025-01 · +1.1 pts (90% band -0.7 to +2.7) 2025-02 · +1.1 pts (90% band -0.7 to +2.6) 2025-03 · +1.1 pts (90% band -0.6 to +2.6) 2025-04 · +1.1 pts (90% band -0.5 to +2.5) 2025-05 · +1.0 pts (90% band -0.6 to +2.4) 2025-06 · +1.0 pts (90% band -0.7 to +2.4) 2025-07 · +0.9 pts (90% band -0.7 to +2.3) 2025-08 · +0.8 pts (90% band -0.9 to +2.2) 2025-09 · +0.8 pts (90% band -1.0 to +2.2) 2025-10 · +0.7 pts (90% band -1.1 to +2.2) 2025-11 · +0.7 pts (90% band -1.3 to +2.3) 2025-12 · +0.7 pts (90% band -1.4 to +2.4) 2026-01 · +0.7 pts (90% band -1.6 to +2.5) 2026-02 · +0.7 pts (90% band -1.7 to +2.5) 2026-03 · +0.7 pts (90% band -1.7 to +2.6) 2026-04 · +0.7 pts (90% band -1.8 to +2.6) 2026-05 · +0.7 pts (90% band -1.9 to +2.7) 2026-06 · +0.7 pts (90% band -2.0 to +2.7) 2026-07 · +0.7 pts (90% band -2.0 to +2.8) 2026-08 · +0.7 pts (90% band -2.1 to +2.8) 2026-09 · +0.7 pts (90% band -2.2 to +2.9) 2026-10 · +0.7 pts (90% band -2.2 to +2.9) -2 +0 +2 2024 2025 2026 pts vs avg pairing
Game log vs expectation
Dots = share of points actually won in each game; line = what
the model expected given both pairings that month (weakest-link included;
descriptive, not a frozen forecast).
2024-08-30 PPA · 11-9 · vs Schoeman/Huynh · w/ Sarah Burr · model expected 60% of points 2024-08-30 PPA · 11-1 · vs Schoeman/Huynh · w/ Sarah Burr · model expected 60% of points 2024-08-31 PPA · 11-7 · vs Saunders/Vine · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 57% of points 2024-08-31 PPA · 11-7 · vs Saunders/Vine · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 57% of points 2024-08-31 PPA · 7-11 · vs Hart/Reek · w/ Sarah Burr · model expected 39% of points 2024-08-31 PPA · 3-11 · vs Hart/Reek · w/ Sarah Burr · model expected 39% of points 2024-09-01 PPA · 5-11 · vs Townsend/Wild · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 32% of points 2024-09-01 PPA · 9-11 · vs Townsend/Wild · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 32% of points 2025-04-25 PPA · 12-14 (OT) · vs Mercado/Pascoe · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 48% of points 2025-04-25 PPA · 13-11 (OT) · vs Mercado/Pascoe · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 48% of points 2025-04-25 PPA · 11-6 · vs Mercado/Pascoe · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 48% of points 2025-04-25 PPA · 11-9 · vs Lee/Kim · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 49% of points 2025-04-25 PPA · 11-9 · vs Lee/Kim · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 49% of points 2025-04-25 PPA · 11-7 · vs Boydston/Horridge · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 56% of points 2025-04-25 PPA · 11-3 · vs Boydston/Horridge · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 56% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 6-11 · vs Burr/Wall · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 41% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 6-11 · vs Burr/Wall · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 41% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 11-8 · vs Rives/McMillan · w/ Katie Morris · model expected 41% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 5-11 · vs Rives/McMillan · w/ Katie Morris · model expected 41% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 7-11 · vs Rives/McMillan · w/ Katie Morris · model expected 41% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 3-11 · vs Townsend/Wild · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 30% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 7-11 · vs Townsend/Wild · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 30% of points 2025-07-03 PPA · 11-0 · vs Mahendra/Tseng · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 74% of points 2025-07-03 PPA · 11-1 · vs Mahendra/Tseng · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 74% of points 2025-07-03 PPA · 9-11 · vs Miyoshi/Wang-Beckvall · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 43% of points 2025-07-03 PPA · 11-13 (OT) · vs Miyoshi/Wang-Beckvall · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 43% of points 2025-07-05 PPA · 5-11 · vs Lai/Ito · w/ Aiko Yoshitomi · model expected 66% of points 2025-07-05 PPA · 11-6 · vs Lai/Ito · w/ Aiko Yoshitomi · model expected 66% of points 2025-07-05 PPA · 11-2 · vs Lai/Ito · w/ Aiko Yoshitomi · model expected 66% of points 2025-07-05 PPA · 8-11 · vs Schoeman/Burr · w/ Aiko Yoshitomi · model expected 38% of points 2025-07-05 PPA · 11-7 · vs Schoeman/Burr · w/ Aiko Yoshitomi · model expected 38% of points 2025-07-05 PPA · 5-11 · vs Schoeman/Burr · w/ Aiko Yoshitomi · model expected 38% of points 2025-08-22 PPA · 4-11 · vs Long/Kim · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 35% of points 2025-08-22 PPA · 0-11 · vs Long/Kim · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 35% of points 2025-08-23 PPA · 4-11 · vs Huynh/Lee · w/ Aiko Yoshitomi · model expected 47% of points 2025-08-23 PPA · 3-11 · vs Huynh/Lee · w/ Aiko Yoshitomi · model expected 47% of points 2025-08-23 PPA · 11-3 · vs Tran/Karina · w/ Aiko Yoshitomi · model expected 51% of points 2025-08-23 PPA · 11-8 · vs Tran/Karina · w/ Aiko Yoshitomi · model expected 51% of points 2025-09-04 PPA · 5-11 · vs Huynh/Do · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 45% of points 2025-09-04 PPA · 8-11 · vs Huynh/Do · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 45% of points 2025-09-06 PPA · 8-11 · vs Kao/Tran · w/ HO Tam · model expected 44% of points 2025-09-06 PPA · 7-11 · vs Kao/Tran · w/ HO Tam · model expected 44% of points 2025-09-24 PPA · 11-9 · vs Rattanapanop/Tay · w/ Jason Taylor · model expected 62% of points 2025-09-24 PPA · 11-3 · vs Rattanapanop/Tay · w/ Jason Taylor · model expected 62% of points 2025-09-24 PPA · 2-11 · vs Tauber/Dawson · w/ Jason Taylor · model expected 29% of points 2025-09-24 PPA · 4-11 · vs Tauber/Dawson · w/ Jason Taylor · model expected 29% of points 2025-09-25 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Turulja/Dikosavljevic · w/ HO Tam · model expected 41% of points 2025-09-25 PPA · 5-11 · vs Turulja/Dikosavljevic · w/ HO Tam · model expected 41% of points 2025-09-25 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Turulja/Dikosavljevic · w/ HO Tam · model expected 41% of points 2025-09-30 PPA · 11-2 · vs Mildwaters/Maleganeas · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 65% of points 2025-09-30 PPA · 11-9 · vs Mildwaters/Maleganeas · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 65% of points 2025-09-30 PPA · 11-6 · vs Tran/Le · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 70% of points 2025-09-30 PPA · 11-2 · vs Tran/Le · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 70% of points 2025-10-01 PPA · 0-11 · vs Trinh/Long · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 38% of points 2025-10-01 PPA · 7-11 · vs Trinh/Long · w/ Leander Lazaro · model expected 38% of points 2025-10-01 PPA · 8-11 · vs Tauber/Wang-Beckvall · w/ Connie Lee · model expected 34% of points 2025-10-01 PPA · 1-11 · vs Tauber/Wang-Beckvall · w/ Connie Lee · model expected 34% of points 2025-10-01 PPA · 9-11 · vs Hazawa/Xie · w/ Connie Lee · model expected 61% of points 2025-10-01 PPA · 11-4 · vs Hazawa/Xie · w/ Connie Lee · model expected 61% of points 2025-10-01 PPA · 11-7 · vs Hazawa/Xie · w/ Connie Lee · model expected 61% of points 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2024 2025 win loss model expectation share of points
Splits
year tour W–L
win% avg score 2024 PPA 4–4 50% 8.5–8.5 2025 PPA 23–29 44% 8.2–8.8
3–3
deciding games (PPA winner-take-all)
2–3
overtime games (past the target)
10
blowout wins (opponents ≤5)
+2
current streak (+W / −L)
Singles
+0.8 (-1.3…+2.8)
pts vs avg active women’s singles player (90%)
rated
29 pro singles games
15–14
singles record · last 2025-10
Full singles ratings →
Partners
Chemistry = pair effect beyond the two players' values, in
points per game; almost everything here is honest noise — no pair in the
sport clears statistical significance (why ).
partner games
W–L point share chem (pts)
Leander Lazaro 29 14–15 50% +0.06 ±0.49 (noise) Aiko Yoshitomi 10 5–5 50% -0.02 ±0.50 (noise) HO Tam 5 1–4 43% +0.02 ±0.49 (noise) Connie Lee 5 2–3 48% -0.03 ±0.52 (noise) Sarah Burr 4 2–2 50% +0.00 ±0.52 (noise) Jason Taylor 4 2–2 45% -0.03 ±0.50 (noise) Katie Morris 3 1–2 43% -0.00 ±0.52 (noise)
Recent games
date tour partner
opponents score vs exp
2025-10-01 PPA · womens Connie Lee Hazawa/Xie 11-7 -0% 2025-10-01 PPA · womens Connie Lee Hazawa/Xie 11-4 +12% 2025-10-01 PPA · womens Connie Lee Hazawa/Xie 9-11 -16% 2025-10-01 PPA · womens Connie Lee Tauber/Wang-Beckvall 1-11 -25% 2025-10-01 PPA · womens Connie Lee Tauber/Wang-Beckvall 8-11 +9% 2025-10-01 PPA · mixed Leander Lazaro Trinh/Long 7-11 +1% 2025-10-01 PPA · mixed Leander Lazaro Trinh/Long 0-11 -38% 2025-09-30 PPA · mixed Leander Lazaro Tran/Le 11-2 +14% 2025-09-30 PPA · mixed Leander Lazaro Tran/Le 11-6 -6% 2025-09-30 PPA · mixed Leander Lazaro Mildwaters/Maleganeas 11-9 -10% 2025-09-30 PPA · mixed Leander Lazaro Mildwaters/Maleganeas 11-2 +19% 2025-09-25 PPA · womens HO Tam Turulja/Dikosavljevic 10-12 OT +4%
Put Sarah in the simulator →
Unofficial fan analytics based on public results data —
not affiliated with any tour. Every number that has an error bar shows it;
cross-gender rankings are never published as fact (why ).
Model: Bayesian, 36k games, validated 77.4% winner accuracy on 884 unseen
games · data through 2026-10-15.