Sarah Burr W
womens 26–25 · mixed 19–19
+3.0 (+1.3…+4.5)
pts vs avg pairing (90% interval)
#96
of 204 active women (within gender only)
45–44
career record · 51% wins, 52% of points
Skill trajectory
Monthly posterior value (converted to points vs an average
pairing) with a 90% credible band. Flat months = little evidence, not zero
games.
2024-01 · +2.7 pts (90% band +0.8 to +4.4) 2024-02 · +2.8 pts (90% band +0.9 to +4.4) 2024-03 · +2.8 pts (90% band +1.0 to +4.3) 2024-04 · +2.8 pts (90% band +1.1 to +4.3) 2024-05 · +2.9 pts (90% band +1.2 to +4.3) 2024-06 · +2.9 pts (90% band +1.3 to +4.3) 2024-07 · +2.9 pts (90% band +1.4 to +4.2) 2024-08 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.5 to +4.3) 2024-09 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.5 to +4.2) 2024-10 · +2.9 pts (90% band +1.6 to +4.2) 2024-11 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.6 to +4.1) 2024-12 · +2.9 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.1) 2025-01 · +2.9 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.1) 2025-02 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.1) 2025-03 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.8 to +4.1) 2025-04 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.8 to +4.0) 2025-05 · +2.9 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.0) 2025-06 · +2.9 pts (90% band +1.6 to +4.0) 2025-07 · +2.8 pts (90% band +1.6 to +3.9) 2025-08 · +2.8 pts (90% band +1.6 to +3.9) 2025-09 · +2.8 pts (90% band +1.6 to +3.9) 2025-10 · +2.9 pts (90% band +1.6 to +4.0) 2025-11 · +2.9 pts (90% band +1.6 to +4.1) 2025-12 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.2) 2026-01 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.6 to +4.2) 2026-02 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.6 to +4.2) 2026-03 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.6 to +4.3) 2026-04 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.5 to +4.3) 2026-05 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.5 to +4.3) 2026-06 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.5 to +4.4) 2026-07 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.4 to +4.4) 2026-08 · +3.1 pts (90% band +1.4 to +4.5) 2026-09 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.4 to +4.5) 2026-10 · +3.0 pts (90% band +1.3 to +4.5) +1 +2 +3 +4 2024 2025 2026 pts vs avg pairing
Game log vs expectation
Dots = share of points actually won in each game; line = what
the model expected given both pairings that month (weakest-link included;
descriptive, not a frozen forecast).
2024-08-30 PPA · 11-9 · vs Schoeman/Huynh · w/ Sarah Jane Lim · model expected 60% of points 2024-08-30 PPA · 11-1 · vs Schoeman/Huynh · w/ Sarah Jane Lim · model expected 60% of points 2024-08-31 PPA · 11-2 · vs Lococo/Carter · w/ Roman Estareja · model expected 76% of points 2024-08-31 PPA · 11-2 · vs Lococo/Carter · w/ Roman Estareja · model expected 76% of points 2024-08-31 PPA · 7-11 · vs Hart/Reek · w/ Sarah Jane Lim · model expected 39% of points 2024-08-31 PPA · 3-11 · vs Hart/Reek · w/ Sarah Jane Lim · model expected 39% of points 2024-09-01 PPA · 11-4 · vs Bates/Yates · w/ Roman Estareja · model expected 43% of points 2024-09-01 PPA · 7-11 · vs Bates/Yates · w/ Roman Estareja · model expected 43% of points 2024-09-01 PPA · 11-4 · vs Bates/Yates · w/ Roman Estareja · model expected 43% of points 2024-09-01 PPA · 7-11 · vs Esquivel/Haas · w/ Roman Estareja · model expected 54% of points 2024-09-01 PPA · 7-11 · vs Esquivel/Haas · w/ Roman Estareja · model expected 54% of points 2025-01-31 PPA · 5-11 · vs Reek/Hart · w/ Nicola Schoeman · model expected 48% of points 2025-01-31 PPA · 8-11 · vs Reek/Hart · w/ Nicola Schoeman · model expected 48% of points 2025-02-01 PPA · 4-11 · vs Dalla-Bona/Stirling · w/ Vishal Masand · model expected 45% of points 2025-02-01 PPA · 11-13 (OT) · vs Dalla-Bona/Stirling · w/ Vishal Masand · model expected 45% of points 2025-04-25 PPA · 11-0 · vs Graham/Smith · w/ George Wall · model expected 91% of points 2025-04-25 PPA · 11-1 · vs Graham/Smith · w/ George Wall · model expected 91% of points 2025-04-25 PPA · 11-2 · vs Thakare/Kapadia · w/ George Wall · model expected 54% of points 2025-04-25 PPA · 11-3 · vs Thakare/Kapadia · w/ George Wall · model expected 54% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 11-6 · vs Lim/Lazaro · w/ George Wall · model expected 59% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 11-6 · vs Lim/Lazaro · w/ George Wall · model expected 59% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 11-0 · vs Dikosavljevic/Stirling · w/ George Wall · model expected 49% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 5-11 · vs Dikosavljevic/Stirling · w/ George Wall · model expected 49% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 14-12 (OT) · vs Dikosavljevic/Stirling · w/ George Wall · model expected 49% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 11-0 · vs Huynh/Debol · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 79% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 11-3 · vs Huynh/Debol · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 79% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 7-11 · vs Schoeman/Hargreaves · w/ George Wall · model expected 53% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 5-11 · vs Schoeman/Hargreaves · w/ George Wall · model expected 53% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 7-11 · vs Townsend/Esquivel · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 35% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Townsend/Esquivel · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 35% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 11-7 · vs Yoshitomi/Donatoni · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 58% of points 2025-04-26 PPA · 11-2 · vs Yoshitomi/Donatoni · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 58% of points 2025-04-27 PPA · 11-7 · vs Dikosavljevic/Thakare · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 59% of points 2025-04-27 PPA · 11-8 · vs Dikosavljevic/Thakare · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 59% of points 2025-07-04 PPA · 8-11 · vs Mehta/Mehta · w/ Mitchell Hargreaves · model expected 43% of points 2025-07-04 PPA · 1-11 · vs Mehta/Mehta · w/ Mitchell Hargreaves · model expected 43% of points 2025-07-05 PPA · 11-5 · vs Shima/Tseng · w/ Nicola Schoeman · model expected 71% of points 2025-07-05 PPA · 11-6 · vs Shima/Tseng · w/ Nicola Schoeman · model expected 71% of points 2025-07-05 PPA · 11-8 · vs Yoshitomi/Lim · w/ Nicola Schoeman · model expected 62% of points 2025-07-05 PPA · 7-11 · vs Yoshitomi/Lim · w/ Nicola Schoeman · model expected 62% of points 2025-07-05 PPA · 11-5 · vs Yoshitomi/Lim · w/ Nicola Schoeman · model expected 62% of points 2025-07-06 PPA · 8-11 · vs Wei/Wang-Beckvall · w/ Nicola Schoeman · model expected 42% of points 2025-07-06 PPA · 5-11 · vs Wei/Wang-Beckvall · w/ Nicola Schoeman · model expected 42% of points 2025-07-06 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Wang/Yi · w/ Nicola Schoeman · model expected 61% of points 2025-07-06 PPA · 11-9 · vs Wang/Yi · w/ Nicola Schoeman · model expected 61% of points 2025-07-06 PPA · 7-11 · vs Wang/Yi · w/ Nicola Schoeman · model expected 61% of points 2025-09-05 PPA · 4-11 · vs Truong/Truong · w/ Louis Laville · model expected 29% of points 2025-09-05 PPA · 6-11 · vs Truong/Truong · w/ Louis Laville · model expected 29% of points 2025-09-05 PPA · 11-7 · vs Kwon/Wong · w/ Louis Laville · model expected 43% of points 2025-09-05 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Kwon/Wong · w/ Louis Laville · model expected 43% of points 2025-09-06 PPA · 8-11 · vs Kao/Tran · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 57% of points 2025-09-06 PPA · 11-2 · vs Kao/Tran · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 57% of points 2025-09-06 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Kao/Tran · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 57% of points 2025-09-06 PPA · 11-3 · vs Tran/Tran · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 72% of points 2025-09-06 PPA · 11-3 · vs Tran/Tran · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 72% of points 2025-09-07 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Wang-Beckvall/Mercado · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 53% of points 2025-09-07 PPA · 4-11 · vs Wang-Beckvall/Mercado · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 53% of points 2025-09-07 PPA · 4-11 · vs Wang-Beckvall/Mercado · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 53% of points 2025-09-07 PPA · 5-11 · vs Schoeman/Townsend · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 35% of points 2025-09-07 PPA · 4-11 · vs Schoeman/Townsend · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 35% of points 2025-12-03 PPA · 11-0 · vs Xie/Miao · w/ Prycen Haas · model expected 71% of points 2025-12-03 PPA · 11-5 · vs Xie/Miao · w/ Prycen Haas · model expected 71% of points 2025-12-04 PPA · 11-1 · vs Lueangtawikit/Wong · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 74% of points 2025-12-04 PPA · 11-3 · vs Lueangtawikit/Wong · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 74% of points 2025-12-04 PPA · 7-11 · vs Schoeman/Trinh · w/ Prycen Haas · model expected 43% of points 2025-12-04 PPA · 2-11 · vs Schoeman/Trinh · w/ Prycen Haas · model expected 43% of points 2025-12-04 PPA · 7-11 · vs Tam/Tang · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 54% of points 2025-12-04 PPA · 11-7 · vs Tam/Tang · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 54% of points 2025-12-04 PPA · 11-7 · vs Tam/Tang · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 54% of points 2025-12-05 PPA · 11-6 · vs Yoshitomi/Wheatley · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 57% of points 2025-12-05 PPA · 11-2 · vs Yoshitomi/Wheatley · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 57% of points 2025-12-06 PPA · 8-11 · vs Truong/Wang · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 35% of points 2025-12-06 PPA · 6-11 · vs Truong/Wang · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 35% of points 2026-07-08 MLP · 9-11 · vs Smith/Wang · w/ Talia Saunders · model expected 37% of points 2026-07-10 MLP · 4-11 · vs Irvine/Humberg · w/ Talia Saunders · model expected 31% of points 2026-07-10 MLP · 2-11 · vs Humberg/Young · w/ Zachary Grabovic · model expected 31% of points 2026-08-15 PPA · 11-9 · vs Hart/Massih · w/ Aria Henare · model expected 51% of points 2026-08-15 PPA · 11-3 · vs Hart/Massih · w/ Aria Henare · model expected 51% of points 2026-08-15 PPA · 2-11 · vs Dennehy/Dalla-Bona · w/ Aria Henare · model expected 34% of points 2026-08-15 PPA · 6-11 · vs Dennehy/Dalla-Bona · w/ Aria Henare · model expected 34% of points 2026-08-16 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Dalla-Bona/Grabovic · w/ Vishal Masand · model expected 49% of points 2026-08-16 PPA · 8-11 · vs Dalla-Bona/Grabovic · w/ Vishal Masand · model expected 49% of points 2026-08-16 PPA · 3-11 · vs Dalla-Bona/Grabovic · w/ Vishal Masand · model expected 49% of points 2026-08-16 PPA · 11-2 · vs Donnelly/Henare · w/ Vishal Masand · model expected 71% of points 2026-08-16 PPA · 11-3 · vs Donnelly/Henare · w/ Vishal Masand · model expected 71% of points 2026-10-14 PPA · 0-11 · vs Huynh/Truong · w/ ? 2026-10-14 PPA · 5-11 · vs Huynh/Truong · w/ ? 2026-10-15 PPA · 5-11 · vs Haas/Sawaki · w/ Rika Fujiwara · model expected 50% of points 2026-10-15 PPA · 4-11 · vs Haas/Sawaki · w/ Rika Fujiwara · model expected 50% of points 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2024 2025 2026 win loss model expectation share of points
Splits
year tour W–L
win% avg score 2024 PPA 6–5 55% 8.8–7.0 2025 PPA 34–28 55% 8.9–7.7 2026 MLP 0–3 0% 5.0–11.0 2026 PPA 5–8 38% 6.8–8.8
5–3
deciding games (PPA winner-take-all)
5–3
overtime games (past the target)
26
blowout wins (opponents ≤5)
-4
current streak (+W / −L)
Singles
-3.4 (-5.7…-0.3)
pts vs avg active women’s singles player (90%)
rated
10 pro singles games
4–6
singles record · last 2026-10
Full singles ratings →
Partners
Chemistry = pair effect beyond the two players' values, in
points per game; almost everything here is honest noise — no pair in the
sport clears statistical significance (why ).
partner games
W–L point share chem (pts)
Jamie Haas 27 17–10 57% +0.14 ±0.52 (noise) Nicola Schoeman 12 5–7 49% -0.22 ±0.50 (noise) George Wall 11 8–3 63% +0.12 ±0.48 (noise) Roman Estareja 7 4–3 59% +0.08 ±0.47 (noise) Vishal Masand 7 3–4 50% -0.02 ±0.50 (noise) Sarah Jane Lim 4 2–2 50% +0.00 ±0.52 (noise) Louis Laville 4 2–2 46% +0.08 ±0.50 (noise) Prycen Haas 4 2–2 53% -0.03 ±0.53 (noise) Aria Henare 4 2–2 47% +0.03 ±0.50 (noise) Mitchell Hargreaves 2 0–2 29% -0.06 ±0.50 (noise) Talia Saunders 2 0–2 37% +0.01 ±0.49 (noise) ? 2 0–2 19% —
Recent games
date tour partner
opponents score vs exp
2026-10-15 PPA · womens Rika Fujiwara Haas/Sawaki 4-11 -24% 2026-10-15 PPA · womens Rika Fujiwara Haas/Sawaki 5-11 -19% 2026-10-14 PPA · mixed ? Huynh/Truong 5-11 — 2026-10-14 PPA · mixed ? Huynh/Truong 0-11 — 2026-08-16 PPA · mixed Vishal Masand Donnelly/Henare 11-3 +8% 2026-08-16 PPA · mixed Vishal Masand Donnelly/Henare 11-2 +14% 2026-08-16 PPA · mixed Vishal Masand Dalla-Bona/Grabovic 3-11 -28% 2026-08-16 PPA · mixed Vishal Masand Dalla-Bona/Grabovic 8-11 -7% 2026-08-16 PPA · mixed Vishal Masand Dalla-Bona/Grabovic 12-10 OT+5% 2026-08-15 PPA · womens Aria Henare Dennehy/Dalla-Bona 6-11 +1% 2026-08-15 PPA · womens Aria Henare Dennehy/Dalla-Bona 2-11 -19% 2026-08-15 PPA · womens Aria Henare Hart/Massih 11-3 +27%
Put Sarah in the simulator →
Unofficial fan analytics based on public results data —
not affiliated with any tour. Every number that has an error bar shows it;
cross-gender rankings are never published as fact (why ).
Model: Bayesian, 36k games, validated 77.4% winner accuracy on 884 unseen
games · data through 2026-10-15.