Andrew Loftin M
mens 12–18 · mixed 14–17
+1.2 (-0.4…+2.6)
pts vs avg pairing (90% interval)
#248
of 286 active men (within gender only)
26–35
career record · 43% wins, 46% of points
Skill trajectory
Monthly posterior value (converted to points vs an average
pairing) with a 90% credible band. Flat months = little evidence, not zero
games.
2024-01 · +1.1 pts (90% band -1.8 to +3.3) 2024-02 · +1.1 pts (90% band -1.8 to +3.3) 2024-03 · +1.1 pts (90% band -1.7 to +3.3) 2024-04 · +1.1 pts (90% band -1.7 to +3.3) 2024-05 · +1.1 pts (90% band -1.7 to +3.3) 2024-06 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.6 to +3.3) 2024-07 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.6 to +3.3) 2024-08 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.5 to +3.3) 2024-09 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.5 to +3.2) 2024-10 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.4 to +3.2) 2024-11 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.3 to +3.2) 2024-12 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.2 to +3.2) 2025-01 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.2 to +3.1) 2025-02 · +1.2 pts (90% band -1.1 to +3.1) 2025-03 · +1.3 pts (90% band -1.0 to +3.1) 2025-04 · +1.3 pts (90% band -1.0 to +3.1) 2025-05 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.9 to +3.1) 2025-06 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.8 to +3.0) 2025-07 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.7 to +3.0) 2025-08 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.6 to +3.0) 2025-09 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.5 to +2.9) 2025-10 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.4 to +2.9) 2025-11 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.3 to +2.8) 2025-12 · +1.4 pts (90% band -0.2 to +2.8) 2026-01 · +1.4 pts (90% band +0.0 to +2.7) 2026-02 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.0 to +2.6) 2026-03 · +1.4 pts (90% band +0.0 to +2.6) 2026-04 · +1.4 pts (90% band +0.1 to +2.6) 2026-05 · +1.4 pts (90% band +0.1 to +2.6) 2026-06 · +1.4 pts (90% band +0.1 to +2.6) 2026-07 · +1.3 pts (90% band +0.0 to +2.5) 2026-08 · +1.3 pts (90% band -0.0 to +2.5) 2026-09 · +1.2 pts (90% band -0.2 to +2.5) 2026-10 · +1.2 pts (90% band -0.4 to +2.6) -2 +0 +2 2024 2025 2026 pts vs avg pairing
Game log vs expectation
Dots = share of points actually won in each game; line = what
the model expected given both pairings that month (weakest-link included;
descriptive, not a frozen forecast).
2026-01-10 PPA · 11-7 · vs Vallejo/Hong · w/ Amir Evgamukov · model expected 63% of points 2026-01-10 PPA · 11-4 · vs Vallejo/Hong · w/ Amir Evgamukov · model expected 63% of points 2026-01-10 PPA · 2-11 · vs Braham/Mack · w/ Amir Evgamukov · model expected 34% of points 2026-01-10 PPA · 3-11 · vs Braham/Mack · w/ Amir Evgamukov · model expected 34% of points 2026-01-10 PPA · 7-11 · vs Wade/Whitaker · w/ Amir Evgamukov · model expected 48% of points 2026-01-10 PPA · 11-5 · vs Wade/Whitaker · w/ Amir Evgamukov · model expected 48% of points 2026-01-10 PPA · 11-8 · vs Wade/Whitaker · w/ Amir Evgamukov · model expected 48% of points 2026-01-10 PPA · 14-16 (OT) · vs Waddell/Engel · w/ Amir Evgamukov · model expected 44% of points 2026-01-11 PPA · 11-9 · vs Nani/Aldridge · w/ Brittni Tonnessen · model expected 42% of points 2026-01-11 PPA · 11-8 · vs Nani/Aldridge · w/ Brittni Tonnessen · model expected 42% of points 2026-01-11 PPA · 7-11 · vs Sobek/Frantova · w/ Brittni Tonnessen · model expected 35% of points 2026-01-11 PPA · 4-11 · vs Sobek/Frantova · w/ Brittni Tonnessen · model expected 35% of points 2026-01-11 PPA · 15-5 · vs Quintero/Moreno · w/ Brittni Tonnessen · model expected 50% of points 2026-01-11 PPA · 7-15 · vs Powell/Conard · w/ Brittni Tonnessen · model expected 30% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 4-15 · vs Copetti/Garcia · w/ Michael Burdakin · model expected 43% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 11-8 · vs Horricks/Gomez · w/ Michael Burdakin · model expected 32% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 0-11 · vs Horricks/Gomez · w/ Michael Burdakin · model expected 32% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 4-11 · vs Horricks/Gomez · w/ Michael Burdakin · model expected 32% of points 2026-02-22 PPA · 6-11 · vs Pradeep/Mireles · w/ Ava Pisacrita · model expected 51% of points 2026-02-22 PPA · 11-8 · vs Pradeep/Mireles · w/ Ava Pisacrita · model expected 51% of points 2026-02-22 PPA · 2-11 · vs Pradeep/Mireles · w/ Ava Pisacrita · model expected 51% of points 2026-02-22 PPA · 15-9 · vs Fortino/Duarah · w/ Ava Pisacrita · model expected 55% of points 2026-02-22 PPA · 7-15 · vs Alto/Gordon · w/ Ava Pisacrita · model expected 52% of points 2026-02-22 PPA · 15-12 · vs Petropouleas/Gomez · w/ Ava Pisacrita · model expected 53% of points 2026-03-07 PPA · 6-11 · vs Steiner/Varon · w/ Jae Centonze · model expected 39% of points 2026-03-07 PPA · 6-11 · vs Steiner/Varon · w/ Jae Centonze · model expected 39% of points 2026-03-08 PPA · 7-11 · vs Faletto/Rodriguez · w/ Ava Ignatowich · model expected 32% of points 2026-03-08 PPA · 3-11 · vs Faletto/Rodriguez · w/ Ava Ignatowich · model expected 32% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 11-7 · vs Kotnana/Hared · w/ Nicolas Almeida · model expected 49% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 11-9 · vs Kotnana/Hared · w/ Nicolas Almeida · model expected 49% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 12-15 · vs Roddy/Shick · w/ Nicolas Almeida · model expected 36% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 15-6 · vs Payne/Turner · w/ Nicolas Almeida · model expected 63% of points 2026-05-23 PPA · 7-15 · vs Bryant/Wasson · w/ Nicolas Almeida · model expected 51% of points 2026-05-24 PPA · 7-11 · vs Grubbs/Jansen · w/ Ava Pisacrita · model expected 34% of points 2026-05-24 PPA · 7-11 · vs Grubbs/Jansen · w/ Ava Pisacrita · model expected 34% of points 2026-05-24 PPA · 14-16 (OT) · vs Varon/Wynne · w/ Ava Pisacrita · model expected 41% of points 2026-08-29 PPA · 8-15 · vs Kim/Mody · w/ Dylan Lewis · model expected 39% of points 2026-08-29 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs El-Zarif/Preissler · w/ Dylan Lewis · model expected 41% of points 2026-08-29 PPA · 8-11 · vs El-Zarif/Preissler · w/ Dylan Lewis · model expected 41% of points 2026-08-29 PPA · 7-11 · vs El-Zarif/Preissler · w/ Dylan Lewis · model expected 41% of points 2026-08-30 PPA · 11-2 · vs Wang/Radermacher · w/ Allie Reichert · model expected 53% of points 2026-08-30 PPA · 11-9 · vs Wang/Radermacher · w/ Allie Reichert · model expected 53% of points 2026-08-30 PPA · 15-9 · vs Okelley/Wimbish · w/ Allie Reichert · model expected 62% of points 2026-08-30 PPA · 15-12 · vs Kim/Lu · w/ Allie Reichert · model expected 52% of points 2026-08-30 PPA · 4-15 · vs Alhouni/Conard · w/ Allie Reichert · model expected 45% of points 2026-08-30 PPA · 15-13 · vs Gonnering/Radzikowska · w/ Allie Reichert · model expected 43% of points 2026-08-30 PPA · 6-11 · vs Stratman/Delgado · w/ Allie Reichert · model expected 37% of points 2026-08-30 PPA · 7-11 · vs Stratman/Delgado · w/ Allie Reichert · model expected 37% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 4-15 · vs Whittaker/Bakalinsky · w/ Nicolas Almeida · model expected 37% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 3-11 · vs Morris/Koszuta · w/ Nicolas Almeida · model expected 31% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 6-11 · vs Morris/Koszuta · w/ Nicolas Almeida · model expected 31% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 9-11 · vs Edwards/Goodman · w/ Nicolas Almeida · model expected 41% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 11-8 · vs Edwards/Goodman · w/ Nicolas Almeida · model expected 41% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Edwards/Goodman · w/ Nicolas Almeida · model expected 41% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 15-9 · vs Galarza/Wolf · w/ Nicolas Almeida · model expected 65% of points 2026-09-27 PPA · 6-15 · vs Angulo/Ferguson · w/ Kelsey Laurente · model expected 53% of points 2026-09-27 PPA · 15-9 · vs Youn/Nair · w/ Kelsey Laurente · model expected 68% of points 2026-09-27 PPA · 11-8 · vs Dolese/Coyner · w/ Kelsey Laurente · model expected 75% of points 2026-09-27 PPA · 11-0 · vs Dolese/Coyner · w/ Kelsey Laurente · model expected 75% of points 2026-09-27 PPA · 8-11 · vs Eaby/Stanciu · w/ Kelsey Laurente · model expected 52% of points 2026-09-27 PPA · 7-11 · vs Eaby/Stanciu · w/ Kelsey Laurente · model expected 52% of points 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2026 win loss model expectation share of points
Splits
year tour W–L
win% avg score 2026 PPA 26–35 43% 8.9–10.4
2–3
deciding games (PPA winner-take-all)
2–2
overtime games (past the target)
4
blowout wins (opponents ≤5)
-2
current streak (+W / −L)
Singles
-3.5 (-6.9…+1.6)
pts vs avg active men’s singles player (90%)
projected
no singles record — projected from doubles, selection-corrected
Full singles ratings →
Partners
Chemistry = pair effect beyond the two players' values, in
points per game; almost everything here is honest noise — no pair in the
sport clears statistical significance (why ).
partner games
W–L point share chem (pts)
Nicolas Almeida 12 6–6 48% +0.08 ±0.50 (noise) Ava Pisacrita 9 3–6 45% -0.02 ±0.50 (noise) Amir Evgamukov 8 4–4 49% +0.02 ±0.50 (noise) Allie Reichert 8 5–3 51% +0.06 ±0.50 (noise) Brittni Tonnessen 6 3–3 48% +0.17 ±0.52 (noise) Kelsey Laurente 6 3–3 52% -0.17 ±0.51 (noise) Michael Burdakin 4 1–3 30% -0.07 ±0.55 (noise) Dylan Lewis 4 1–3 43% +0.02 ±0.50 (noise) Jae Centonze 2 0–2 35% -0.02 ±0.50 (noise) Ava Ignatowich 2 0–2 31% -0.00 ±0.50 (noise)
Recent games
date tour partner
opponents score vs exp
2026-09-27 PPA · mixed Kelsey Laurente Eaby/Stanciu 7-11 -14% 2026-09-27 PPA · mixed Kelsey Laurente Eaby/Stanciu 8-11 -10% 2026-09-27 PPA · mixed Kelsey Laurente Dolese/Coyner 11-0 +25% 2026-09-27 PPA · mixed Kelsey Laurente Dolese/Coyner 11-8 -17% 2026-09-27 PPA · mixed Kelsey Laurente Youn/Nair 15-9 -6% 2026-09-27 PPA · mixed Kelsey Laurente Angulo/Ferguson 6-15 -25% 2026-09-26 PPA · mens Nicolas Almeida Galarza/Wolf 15-9 -3% 2026-09-26 PPA · mens Nicolas Almeida Edwards/Goodman 12-10 OT+14% 2026-09-26 PPA · mens Nicolas Almeida Edwards/Goodman 11-8 +17% 2026-09-26 PPA · mens Nicolas Almeida Edwards/Goodman 9-11 +4% 2026-09-26 PPA · mens Nicolas Almeida Morris/Koszuta 6-11 +4% 2026-09-26 PPA · mens Nicolas Almeida Morris/Koszuta 3-11 -10%
Put Andrew in the simulator →
Unofficial fan analytics based on public results data —
not affiliated with any tour. Every number that has an error bar shows it;
cross-gender rankings are never published as fact (why ).
Model: Bayesian, 36k games, validated 77.4% winner accuracy on 884 unseen
games · data through 2026-10-15.