Lyn Yuen Choo W
womens 27–15 · mixed 18–10
+3.5 (+1.7…+5.0)
pts vs avg pairing (90% interval)
#81
of 204 active women (within gender only)
45–25
career record · 64% wins, 56% of points
Skill trajectory
Monthly posterior value (converted to points vs an average
pairing) with a 90% credible band. Flat months = little evidence, not zero
games.
2024-01 · +3.0 pts (90% band +0.6 to +5.0) 2024-02 · +3.1 pts (90% band +0.7 to +5.0) 2024-03 · +3.1 pts (90% band +0.8 to +5.0) 2024-04 · +3.1 pts (90% band +0.8 to +5.0) 2024-05 · +3.2 pts (90% band +0.9 to +5.0) 2024-06 · +3.2 pts (90% band +0.9 to +5.0) 2024-07 · +3.2 pts (90% band +1.0 to +5.0) 2024-08 · +3.3 pts (90% band +1.1 to +5.0) 2024-09 · +3.3 pts (90% band +1.1 to +5.0) 2024-10 · +3.3 pts (90% band +1.2 to +5.0) 2024-11 · +3.3 pts (90% band +1.2 to +5.0) 2024-12 · +3.3 pts (90% band +1.3 to +5.0) 2025-01 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.4 to +5.0) 2025-02 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.4 to +5.0) 2025-03 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.5 to +5.0) 2025-04 · +3.5 pts (90% band +1.6 to +5.0) 2025-05 · +3.5 pts (90% band +1.6 to +5.0) 2025-06 · +3.5 pts (90% band +1.7 to +5.0) 2025-07 · +3.5 pts (90% band +1.8 to +5.0) 2025-08 · +3.6 pts (90% band +1.8 to +5.0) 2025-09 · +3.6 pts (90% band +1.9 to +5.0) 2025-10 · +3.6 pts (90% band +1.9 to +5.0) 2025-11 · +3.6 pts (90% band +2.0 to +5.0) 2025-12 · +3.7 pts (90% band +2.1 to +5.0) 2026-01 · +3.7 pts (90% band +2.2 to +4.9) 2026-02 · +3.7 pts (90% band +2.2 to +4.9) 2026-03 · +3.7 pts (90% band +2.2 to +4.9) 2026-04 · +3.6 pts (90% band +2.1 to +4.9) 2026-05 · +3.6 pts (90% band +2.1 to +4.9) 2026-06 · +3.6 pts (90% band +2.0 to +4.9) 2026-07 · +3.6 pts (90% band +1.9 to +5.0) 2026-08 · +3.5 pts (90% band +1.8 to +5.0) 2026-09 · +3.5 pts (90% band +1.8 to +5.0) 2026-10 · +3.5 pts (90% band +1.7 to +5.0) +2 +4 2024 2025 2026 pts vs avg pairing
Game log vs expectation
Dots = share of points actually won in each game; line = what
the model expected given both pairings that month (weakest-link included;
descriptive, not a frozen forecast).
2026-01-12 PPA · 11-5 · vs Cross/Sidell · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 69% of points 2026-01-12 PPA · 11-4 · vs Cross/Sidell · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 69% of points 2026-01-12 PPA · 11-2 · vs Fossorier/McLaughlan · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 72% of points 2026-01-12 PPA · 11-2 · vs Fossorier/McLaughlan · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 72% of points 2026-01-12 PPA · 11-8 · vs McLaughlan/Ora · w/ Ryan Skufca · model expected 68% of points 2026-01-12 PPA · 11-5 · vs McLaughlan/Ora · w/ Ryan Skufca · model expected 68% of points 2026-01-12 PPA · 11-6 · vs Olson/Hess · w/ Ryan Skufca · model expected 70% of points 2026-01-12 PPA · 11-3 · vs Olson/Hess · w/ Ryan Skufca · model expected 70% of points 2026-01-13 PPA · 4-11 · vs Bar/Kawamoto · w/ Ryan Skufca · model expected 25% of points 2026-01-13 PPA · 7-11 · vs Bar/Kawamoto · w/ Ryan Skufca · model expected 25% of points 2026-01-13 PPA · 11-7 · vs Griffith/Cincola · w/ Ryan Skufca · model expected 51% of points 2026-01-13 PPA · 11-4 · vs Griffith/Cincola · w/ Ryan Skufca · model expected 51% of points 2026-01-14 PPA · 8-11 · vs Conard/Dunlap · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 48% of points 2026-01-14 PPA · 11-6 · vs Conard/Dunlap · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 48% of points 2026-01-14 PPA · 8-11 · vs Conard/Dunlap · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 48% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 11-9 · vs Yeh/Phillips · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 48% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 3-11 · vs Yeh/Phillips · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 48% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 8-11 · vs Yeh/Phillips · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 48% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 15-10 · vs Minniefield/Williams · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 59% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 6-15 · vs Hatton/Conard · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 54% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 15-6 · vs Pradeep/Martins · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 69% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 11-0 · vs Gordon/Fitzgerald · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 72% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 11-4 · vs Gordon/Fitzgerald · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 72% of points 2026-02-21 PPA · 15-4 · vs Newman/Emmrich · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 48% of points 2026-02-22 PPA · 5-11 · vs Williams/Hamaguchi · w/ Mark Growcott · model expected 57% of points 2026-02-22 PPA · 11-8 · vs Williams/Hamaguchi · w/ Mark Growcott · model expected 57% of points 2026-02-22 PPA · 3-11 · vs Williams/Hamaguchi · w/ Mark Growcott · model expected 57% of points 2026-03-09 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Ulery/Anderson · w/ Brandon Fritze · model expected 57% of points 2026-03-09 PPA · 13-11 (OT) · vs Ulery/Anderson · w/ Brandon Fritze · model expected 57% of points 2026-03-09 PPA · 11-8 · vs Ulery/Anderson · w/ Brandon Fritze · model expected 57% of points 2026-03-09 PPA · 7-11 · vs Reichert/Pretorius · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 51% of points 2026-03-09 PPA · 7-11 · vs Reichert/Pretorius · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 51% of points 2026-03-09 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Ho/Radermacher · w/ Brandon Fritze · model expected 60% of points 2026-03-09 PPA · 11-1 · vs Ho/Radermacher · w/ Brandon Fritze · model expected 60% of points 2026-03-09 PPA · 11-4 · vs Altick/Boisvert-Bégin · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 81% of points 2026-03-09 PPA · 11-4 · vs Altick/Boisvert-Bégin · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 81% of points 2026-03-10 PPA · 2-11 · vs Rohrabacher/Bar · w/ Brandon Fritze · model expected 25% of points 2026-03-10 PPA · 2-11 · vs Rohrabacher/Bar · w/ Brandon Fritze · model expected 25% of points 2026-03-10 PPA · 11-6 · vs Yoshitomi/Huang · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 57% of points 2026-03-10 PPA · 11-4 · vs Yoshitomi/Huang · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 57% of points 2026-03-10 PPA · 11-7 · vs Summers/Roddy · w/ Brandon Fritze · model expected 53% of points 2026-03-10 PPA · 11-9 · vs Summers/Roddy · w/ Brandon Fritze · model expected 53% of points 2026-03-11 PPA · 4-11 · vs Fahey/Buckner · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 29% of points 2026-03-11 PPA · 11-9 · vs Fahey/Buckner · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 29% of points 2026-03-11 PPA · 3-11 · vs Fahey/Buckner · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 29% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 11-1 · vs Minniefield/Rasmusen · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 56% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 8-11 · vs Minniefield/Rasmusen · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 56% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 11-7 · vs Minniefield/Rasmusen · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 56% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 11-4 · vs Morgan/Niemann · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 88% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 11-4 · vs Morgan/Niemann · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 88% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 9-11 · vs Petrei/Boydston · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 45% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 3-11 · vs Petrei/Boydston · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 45% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 11-0 · vs Lai/Fortino · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 70% of points 2026-05-30 PPA · 11-4 · vs Lai/Fortino · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 70% of points 2026-05-31 PPA · 11-8 · vs Leonard/Rettke · w/ Mackonner Dy · model expected 62% of points 2026-05-31 PPA · 11-3 · vs Leonard/Rettke · w/ Mackonner Dy · model expected 62% of points 2026-05-31 PPA · 10-15 · vs Davis/Boydston · w/ Mackonner Dy · model expected 55% of points 2026-05-31 PPA · 8-11 · vs Sonday/Newcombe · w/ Mackonner Dy · model expected 46% of points 2026-05-31 PPA · 11-9 · vs Sonday/Newcombe · w/ Mackonner Dy · model expected 46% of points 2026-05-31 PPA · 2-11 · vs Sonday/Newcombe · w/ Mackonner Dy · model expected 46% of points 2026-05-31 PPA · 15-5 · vs Yates/Leonard · w/ Mackonner Dy · model expected 63% of points 2026-05-31 PPA · 15-10 · vs Steiner/Fortino · w/ Mackonner Dy · model expected 59% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 11-8 · vs Grigoriu/Minniefield · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 51% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 9-11 · vs Grigoriu/Minniefield · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 51% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 5-11 · vs Grigoriu/Minniefield · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 51% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 5-15 · vs Bui/Rives · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 42% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 15-6 · vs Lenhart/Maguire · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 72% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 15-5 · vs Liang/McGowan · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 60% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 11-4 · vs Coyner/Nesbitt · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 71% of points 2026-09-26 PPA · 11-6 · vs Coyner/Nesbitt · w/ Natalie Hur · model expected 71% of points 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2026 win loss model expectation share of points
Splits
year tour W–L
win% avg score 2026 PPA 45–25 64% 9.6–7.7
2–6
deciding games (PPA winner-take-all)
2–1
overtime games (past the target)
20
blowout wins (opponents ≤5)
+4
current streak (+W / −L)
Singles
-1.5 (-6.0…+4.1)
pts vs avg active women’s singles player (90%)
projected
no singles record — projected from doubles, selection-corrected
Full singles ratings →
Partners
Chemistry = pair effect beyond the two players' values, in
points per game; almost everything here is honest noise — no pair in the
sport clears statistical significance (why ).
partner games
W–L point share chem (pts)
Natalie Hur 42 27–15 58% +0.08 ±0.49 (noise) Brandon Fritze 9 6–3 51% -0.01 ±0.49 (noise) Ryan Skufca 8 6–2 58% +0.09 ±0.50 (noise) Mackonner Dy 8 5–3 54% -0.01 ±0.49 (noise) Mark Growcott 3 1–2 39% -0.09 ±0.47 (noise)
Recent games
date tour partner
opponents score vs exp
2026-09-26 PPA · womens Natalie Hur Coyner/Nesbitt 11-6 -6% 2026-09-26 PPA · womens Natalie Hur Coyner/Nesbitt 11-4 +2% 2026-09-26 PPA · womens Natalie Hur Liang/McGowan 15-5 +15% 2026-09-26 PPA · womens Natalie Hur Lenhart/Maguire 15-6 -0% 2026-09-26 PPA · womens Natalie Hur Bui/Rives 5-15 -17% 2026-09-26 PPA · womens Natalie Hur Grigoriu/Minniefield 5-11 -20% 2026-09-26 PPA · womens Natalie Hur Grigoriu/Minniefield 9-11 -6% 2026-09-26 PPA · womens Natalie Hur Grigoriu/Minniefield 11-8 +7% 2026-05-31 PPA · mixed Mackonner Dy Steiner/Fortino 15-10 +1% 2026-05-31 PPA · mixed Mackonner Dy Yates/Leonard 15-5 +12% 2026-05-31 PPA · mixed Mackonner Dy Sonday/Newcombe 2-11 -31% 2026-05-31 PPA · mixed Mackonner Dy Sonday/Newcombe 11-9 +9%
Put Lyn in the simulator →
Unofficial fan analytics based on public results data —
not affiliated with any tour. Every number that has an error bar shows it;
cross-gender rankings are never published as fact (why ).
Model: Bayesian, 36k games, validated 77.4% winner accuracy on 884 unseen
games · data through 2026-10-15.