PICKLES

Harsh Mehta M

mens 29–15 · mixed 29–12

+4.9 (+3.2…+6.2)
pts vs avg pairing (90% interval)
—
of 286 active men (within gender only; no 2026 games)
58–27
career record · 68% wins, 59% of points
—
6-month form

Skill trajectory

Monthly posterior value (converted to points vs an average pairing) with a 90% credible band. Flat months = little evidence, not zero games.

2024-01 · +4.1 pts (90% band +2.3 to +5.5)2024-02 · +4.2 pts (90% band +2.4 to +5.5)2024-03 · +4.2 pts (90% band +2.5 to +5.5)2024-04 · +4.2 pts (90% band +2.6 to +5.5)2024-05 · +4.3 pts (90% band +2.7 to +5.6)2024-06 · +4.3 pts (90% band +2.8 to +5.5)2024-07 · +4.3 pts (90% band +2.9 to +5.5)2024-08 · +4.4 pts (90% band +3.0 to +5.5)2024-09 · +4.4 pts (90% band +3.1 to +5.5)2024-10 · +4.5 pts (90% band +3.1 to +5.6)2024-11 · +4.5 pts (90% band +3.2 to +5.6)2024-12 · +4.6 pts (90% band +3.2 to +5.6)2025-01 · +4.6 pts (90% band +3.3 to +5.7)2025-02 · +4.6 pts (90% band +3.4 to +5.7)2025-03 · +4.7 pts (90% band +3.5 to +5.7)2025-04 · +4.7 pts (90% band +3.6 to +5.7)2025-05 · +4.8 pts (90% band +3.6 to +5.7)2025-06 · +4.8 pts (90% band +3.7 to +5.8)2025-07 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.8 to +5.8)2025-08 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.8 to +5.8)2025-09 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.8 to +5.8)2025-10 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.8 to +5.8)2025-11 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.7 to +5.8)2025-12 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.6 to +5.9)2026-01 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.6 to +6.0)2026-02 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.5 to +6.0)2026-03 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.4 to +6.0)2026-04 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.4 to +6.1)2026-05 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.3 to +6.1)2026-06 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.3 to +6.1)2026-07 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.3 to +6.1)2026-08 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.2 to +6.2)2026-09 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.2 to +6.2)2026-10 · +4.9 pts (90% band +3.2 to +6.2)+2+3+4+5+6202420252026pts vs avg pairing

Game log vs expectation

Dots = share of points actually won in each game; line = what the model expected given both pairings that month (weakest-link included; descriptive, not a frozen forecast).

2024-08-30 PPA · 11-2 · vs Horridge/Gray · w/ Armaan Bhatia · model expected 75% of points2024-08-30 PPA · 11-6 · vs Horridge/Gray · w/ Armaan Bhatia · model expected 75% of points2024-08-30 PPA · 11-4 · vs Turvey/Pfitzner · w/ Armaan Bhatia · model expected 77% of points2024-08-30 PPA · 11-2 · vs Turvey/Pfitzner · w/ Armaan Bhatia · model expected 77% of points2024-08-31 PPA · 11-4 · vs Hargreaves/Grabovic · w/ Armaan Bhatia · model expected 62% of points2024-08-31 PPA · 11-2 · vs Hargreaves/Grabovic · w/ Armaan Bhatia · model expected 62% of points2024-08-31 PPA · 11-5 · vs Ruia/Yates · w/ Armaan Bhatia · model expected 57% of points2024-08-31 PPA · 4-11 · vs Ruia/Yates · w/ Armaan Bhatia · model expected 57% of points2024-08-31 PPA · 11-3 · vs Ruia/Yates · w/ Armaan Bhatia · model expected 57% of points2024-08-31 PPA · 13-11 (OT) · vs Whatnall/Estareja · w/ Armaan Bhatia · model expected 62% of points2024-08-31 PPA · 6-11 · vs Whatnall/Estareja · w/ Armaan Bhatia · model expected 62% of points2024-08-31 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Whatnall/Estareja · w/ Armaan Bhatia · model expected 62% of points2024-08-31 PPA · 11-5 · vs Schoeman/Richardson · w/ Ting Chieh Wei · model expected 75% of points2024-08-31 PPA · 11-0 · vs Schoeman/Richardson · w/ Ting Chieh Wei · model expected 75% of points2024-08-31 PPA · 11-5 · vs Huynh/Huynh · w/ Ting Chieh Wei · model expected 83% of points2024-08-31 PPA · 11-5 · vs Huynh/Huynh · w/ Ting Chieh Wei · model expected 83% of points2024-09-01 PPA · 9-11 · vs Townsend/Wild · w/ Ting Chieh Wei · model expected 48% of points2024-09-01 PPA · 8-11 · vs Townsend/Wild · w/ Ting Chieh Wei · model expected 48% of points2025-07-03 PPA · 11-6 · vs Tran/Bhatia · w/ Naimi Mehta · model expected 60% of points2025-07-03 PPA · 11-6 · vs Tran/Bhatia · w/ Naimi Mehta · model expected 60% of points2025-07-03 PPA · 11-5 · vs Man/Chu · w/ Naimi Mehta · model expected 68% of points2025-07-03 PPA · 11-4 · vs Man/Chu · w/ Naimi Mehta · model expected 68% of points2025-07-04 PPA · 3-11 · vs Đức/Long · w/ Naimi Mehta · model expected 48% of points2025-07-04 PPA · 11-1 · vs Đức/Long · w/ Naimi Mehta · model expected 48% of points2025-07-04 PPA · 3-11 · vs Đức/Long · w/ Naimi Mehta · model expected 48% of points2025-07-04 PPA · 11-8 · vs Hargreaves/Burr · w/ Naimi Mehta · model expected 57% of points2025-07-04 PPA · 11-1 · vs Hargreaves/Burr · w/ Naimi Mehta · model expected 57% of points2025-07-05 PPA · 11-1 · vs Bhatia/Wong · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 76% of points2025-07-05 PPA · 11-4 · vs Bhatia/Wong · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 76% of points2025-07-05 PPA · 11-3 · vs Trinh/Ly · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 64% of points2025-07-05 PPA · 11-7 · vs Trinh/Ly · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 64% of points2025-07-06 PPA · 8-11 · vs Miyoshi/Pascoe · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 68% of points2025-07-06 PPA · 11-2 · vs Miyoshi/Pascoe · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 68% of points2025-07-06 PPA · 11-1 · vs Miyoshi/Pascoe · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 68% of points2025-07-06 PPA · 11-3 · vs Grabovic/Wall · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 63% of points2025-07-06 PPA · 11-6 · vs Grabovic/Wall · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 63% of points2025-08-23 PPA · 11-9 · vs Miyoshi/Stirling · w/ Mitchell Hargreaves · model expected 51% of points2025-08-23 PPA · 11-7 · vs Miyoshi/Stirling · w/ Mitchell Hargreaves · model expected 51% of points2025-08-23 PPA · 11-0 · vs Lazaro/Jr · w/ Mitchell Hargreaves · model expected 59% of points2025-08-23 PPA · 11-6 · vs Lazaro/Jr · w/ Mitchell Hargreaves · model expected 59% of points2025-08-24 PPA · 5-11 · vs Wall/Wild · w/ Mitchell Hargreaves · model expected 44% of points2025-08-24 PPA · 3-11 · vs Wall/Wild · w/ Mitchell Hargreaves · model expected 44% of points2025-08-24 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Yu/Yang · w/ Mitchell Hargreaves · model expected 44% of points2025-08-24 PPA · 4-11 · vs Yu/Yang · w/ Mitchell Hargreaves · model expected 44% of points2025-09-04 PPA · 7-11 · vs Dennehy/Miyoshi · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 54% of points2025-09-04 PPA · 11-3 · vs Dennehy/Miyoshi · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 54% of points2025-09-04 PPA · 11-4 · vs Dennehy/Miyoshi · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 54% of points2025-09-04 PPA · 11-6 · vs Mercado/Haas · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 65% of points2025-09-04 PPA · 11-3 · vs Mercado/Haas · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 65% of points2025-09-04 PPA · 11-9 · vs Si/Huynh · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 63% of points2025-09-04 PPA · 11-3 · vs Si/Huynh · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 63% of points2025-09-05 PPA · 11-7 · vs Dizon/Koller · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 45% of points2025-09-05 PPA · 11-8 · vs Dizon/Koller · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 45% of points2025-09-05 PPA · 11-3 · vs Tran/Bhatia · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 65% of points2025-09-05 PPA · 11-3 · vs Tran/Bhatia · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 65% of points2025-09-06 PPA · 6-11 · vs Wang-Beckvall/Kapadia · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 51% of points2025-09-06 PPA · 11-7 · vs Wang-Beckvall/Kapadia · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 51% of points2025-09-06 PPA · 11-6 · vs Wang-Beckvall/Kapadia · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 51% of points2025-09-07 PPA · 4-11 · vs Townsend/Wild · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 43% of points2025-09-07 PPA · 9-11 · vs Townsend/Wild · w/ Jamie Haas · model expected 43% of points2025-09-24 PPA · 11-5 · vs Wong/Heshaam · w/ Selina Turulja · model expected 70% of points2025-09-24 PPA · 11-4 · vs Wong/Heshaam · w/ Selina Turulja · model expected 70% of points2025-09-24 PPA · 11-7 · vs Fan/Leung · w/ Selina Turulja · model expected 69% of points2025-09-24 PPA · 11-8 · vs Fan/Leung · w/ Selina Turulja · model expected 69% of points2025-09-25 PPA · 7-11 · vs Dikosavljevic/Hargreaves · w/ Selina Turulja · model expected 53% of points2025-09-25 PPA · 7-11 · vs Dikosavljevic/Hargreaves · w/ Selina Turulja · model expected 53% of points2025-09-25 PPA · 11-3 · vs Maleganeas/Aiman · w/ Naveen Beasley · model expected 78% of points2025-09-25 PPA · 11-3 · vs Maleganeas/Aiman · w/ Naveen Beasley · model expected 78% of points2025-09-26 PPA · 4-11 · vs Oncins/McGuffin · w/ Naveen Beasley · model expected 43% of points2025-09-26 PPA · 8-11 · vs Oncins/McGuffin · w/ Naveen Beasley · model expected 43% of points2025-10-01 PPA · 11-13 (OT) · vs Trinh/Ly · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 64% of points2025-10-01 PPA · 11-3 · vs Trinh/Ly · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 64% of points2025-10-01 PPA · 11-7 · vs Trinh/Ly · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 64% of points2025-10-01 PPA · 11-4 · vs Bhatia/Christian · w/ Andie Dikosavljevic · model expected 43% of points2025-10-01 PPA · 11-6 · vs Bhatia/Christian · w/ Andie Dikosavljevic · model expected 43% of points2025-10-02 PPA · 3-11 · vs Truong/Truong · w/ Andie Dikosavljevic · model expected 42% of points2025-10-02 PPA · 5-11 · vs Truong/Truong · w/ Andie Dikosavljevic · model expected 42% of points2025-10-02 PPA · 7-11 · vs Kim/Wong · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 61% of points2025-10-02 PPA · 11-3 · vs Kim/Wong · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 61% of points2025-10-02 PPA · 11-5 · vs Kim/Wong · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 61% of points2025-10-03 PPA · 3-11 · vs McGuffin/Oncins · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 47% of points2025-10-03 PPA · 8-11 · vs McGuffin/Oncins · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 47% of points2025-10-04 PPA · 9-11 · vs Johns/Bar · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 43% of points2025-10-04 PPA · 11-9 · vs Johns/Bar · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 43% of points2025-10-04 PPA · 9-11 · vs Johns/Bar · w/ Vanshik Kapadia · model expected 43% of points0%25%50%75%100%20242025winlossmodel expectationshare of points

Splits

yeartourW–L win%avg score
2024PPA14–478%10.2–6.0
2025PPA44–2366%9.4–6.9
7–2
deciding games (PPA winner-take-all)
2–2
overtime games (past the target)
36
blowout wins (opponents ≤5)
10
longest win streak
-1
current streak (+W / −L)

Singles

+1.5 (-3.9…+5.9)
pts vs avg active men’s singles player (90%)
projected
no singles record — projected from doubles, selection-corrected

Full singles ratings →

Partners

Chemistry = pair effect beyond the two players' values, in points per game; almost everything here is honest noise — no pair in the sport clears statistical significance (why).

partnergames W–Lpoint sharechem (pts)
Vanshik Kapadia2013–760%-0.01 ±0.51 (noise)
Jamie Haas1612–460%+0.15 ±0.52 (noise)
Armaan Bhatia1210–263%+0.00 ±0.50 (noise)
Naimi Mehta97–261%+0.08 ±0.52 (noise)
Mitchell Hargreaves84–450%+0.02 ±0.48 (noise)
Ting Chieh Wei64–262%-0.03 ±0.51 (noise)
Selina Turulja64–256%-0.12 ±0.51 (noise)
Naveen Beasley42–255%-0.03 ±0.51 (noise)
Andie Dikosavljevic42–248%+0.03 ±0.50 (noise)

Recent games

datetourpartner opponentsscorevs exp
2025-10-04PPA · mensVanshik KapadiaJohns/Bar9-11+2%
2025-10-04PPA · mensVanshik KapadiaJohns/Bar11-9+12%
2025-10-04PPA · mensVanshik KapadiaJohns/Bar9-11+2%
2025-10-03PPA · mensVanshik KapadiaMcGuffin/Oncins8-11-5%
2025-10-03PPA · mensVanshik KapadiaMcGuffin/Oncins3-11-25%
2025-10-02PPA · mensVanshik KapadiaKim/Wong11-5+8%
2025-10-02PPA · mensVanshik KapadiaKim/Wong11-3+18%
2025-10-02PPA · mensVanshik KapadiaKim/Wong7-11-22%
2025-10-02PPA · mixedAndie DikosavljevicTruong/Truong5-11-11%
2025-10-02PPA · mixedAndie DikosavljevicTruong/Truong3-11-21%
2025-10-01PPA · mixedAndie DikosavljevicBhatia/Christian11-6+22%
2025-10-01PPA · mixedAndie DikosavljevicBhatia/Christian11-4+30%

Put Harsh in the simulator →