Rougel Jon Lutz Aninon M
mens 30–15 · mixed 5–10
+3.4 (+1.2…+5.2)
pts vs avg pairing (90% interval)
#118
of 286 active men (within gender only)
35–25
career record · 58% wins, 54% of points
Skill trajectory
Monthly posterior value (converted to points vs an average
pairing) with a 90% credible band. Flat months = little evidence, not zero
games.
2024-01 · +3.0 pts (90% band +0.8 to +4.8) 2024-02 · +3.0 pts (90% band +0.9 to +4.8) 2024-03 · +3.1 pts (90% band +1.0 to +4.8) 2024-04 · +3.1 pts (90% band +1.1 to +4.8) 2024-05 · +3.1 pts (90% band +1.2 to +4.8) 2024-06 · +3.2 pts (90% band +1.2 to +4.8) 2024-07 · +3.2 pts (90% band +1.3 to +4.7) 2024-08 · +3.2 pts (90% band +1.4 to +4.7) 2024-09 · +3.2 pts (90% band +1.4 to +4.8) 2024-10 · +3.3 pts (90% band +1.5 to +4.7) 2024-11 · +3.3 pts (90% band +1.6 to +4.7) 2024-12 · +3.3 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.7) 2025-01 · +3.3 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.7) 2025-02 · +3.3 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.7) 2025-03 · +3.3 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.7) 2025-04 · +3.3 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.7) 2025-05 · +3.3 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.7) 2025-06 · +3.3 pts (90% band +1.8 to +4.7) 2025-07 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.8 to +4.7) 2025-08 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.8 to +4.7) 2025-09 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.8 to +4.7) 2025-10 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.8 to +4.7) 2025-11 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.7) 2025-12 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.8) 2026-01 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.8) 2026-02 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.7 to +4.8) 2026-03 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.6 to +4.9) 2026-04 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.6 to +4.9) 2026-05 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.5 to +4.9) 2026-06 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.4 to +5.0) 2026-07 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.4 to +5.0) 2026-08 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.3 to +5.1) 2026-09 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.3 to +5.1) 2026-10 · +3.4 pts (90% band +1.2 to +5.2) +2 +4 2024 2025 2026 pts vs avg pairing
Game log vs expectation
Dots = share of points actually won in each game; line = what
the model expected given both pairings that month (weakest-link included;
descriptive, not a frozen forecast).
2024-12-18 PPA · 11-4 · vs Vitale/Brown · w/ Madalina Grigoriu · model expected 47% of points 2024-12-18 PPA · 6-11 · vs Vitale/Brown · w/ Madalina Grigoriu · model expected 47% of points 2024-12-18 PPA · 11-3 · vs Vitale/Brown · w/ Madalina Grigoriu · model expected 47% of points 2024-12-18 PPA · 11-3 · vs Castillo/Svicevic · w/ Joshua Reason · model expected 75% of points 2024-12-18 PPA · 11-3 · vs Castillo/Svicevic · w/ Joshua Reason · model expected 75% of points 2024-12-18 PPA · 2-11 · vs Hendry/Oncins · w/ Madalina Grigoriu · model expected 40% of points 2024-12-18 PPA · 8-11 · vs Hendry/Oncins · w/ Madalina Grigoriu · model expected 40% of points 2024-12-18 PPA · 11-5 · vs Ricardo/Plummer · w/ Madalina Grigoriu · model expected 67% of points 2024-12-18 PPA · 11-2 · vs Ricardo/Plummer · w/ Madalina Grigoriu · model expected 67% of points 2025-03-05 PPA · 13-11 (OT) · vs Sitar/Simon · w/ Madalina Grigoriu · model expected 59% of points 2025-03-05 PPA · 6-11 · vs Sitar/Simon · w/ Madalina Grigoriu · model expected 59% of points 2025-03-05 PPA · 7-11 · vs Sitar/Simon · w/ Madalina Grigoriu · model expected 59% of points 2025-03-05 PPA · 11-5 · vs Cohen/Nilsson · w/ Tobias Moreno · model expected 64% of points 2025-03-05 PPA · 11-5 · vs Cohen/Nilsson · w/ Tobias Moreno · model expected 64% of points 2025-03-05 PPA · 8-11 · vs Reason/Nani · w/ Tobias Moreno · model expected 53% of points 2025-03-05 PPA · 11-6 · vs Reason/Nani · w/ Tobias Moreno · model expected 53% of points 2025-03-05 PPA · 11-9 · vs Reason/Nani · w/ Tobias Moreno · model expected 53% of points 2025-03-05 PPA · 6-11 · vs Marceau/Lamacchio · w/ Tobias Moreno · model expected 40% of points 2025-03-05 PPA · 11-3 · vs Marceau/Lamacchio · w/ Tobias Moreno · model expected 40% of points 2025-03-05 PPA · 7-11 · vs Marceau/Lamacchio · w/ Tobias Moreno · model expected 40% of points 2025-03-08 PPA · 9-11 · vs Wasson/Campbell · w/ Tobias Moreno · model expected 50% of points 2025-03-08 PPA · 9-11 · vs Wasson/Campbell · w/ Tobias Moreno · model expected 50% of points 2025-09-06 PPA · 11-7 · vs Scarp/Dugas · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 64% of points 2025-09-06 PPA · 11-9 · vs Scarp/Dugas · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 64% of points 2025-09-06 PPA · 11-5 · vs Navarrete/Benjamin · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 78% of points 2025-09-06 PPA · 11-4 · vs Navarrete/Benjamin · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 78% of points 2025-09-06 PPA · 11-3 · vs Crum/Benitez · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 53% of points 2025-09-06 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Crum/Benitez · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 53% of points 2025-09-06 PPA · 7-11 · vs Crum/Benitez · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 53% of points 2025-09-07 PPA · 6-11 · vs Aiello/Benjamin · w/ Hanna Duncan · model expected 55% of points 2025-09-07 PPA · 11-5 · vs Garcia/Addington · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 62% of points 2025-09-07 PPA · 9-15 · vs Ruiz/Slive · w/ Hanna Duncan · model expected 31% of points 2025-09-07 PPA · 11-4 · vs Romano/Mogle · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 52% of points 2025-09-07 PPA · 11-6 · vs Nani/Grollman · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 55% of points 2025-09-07 PPA · 11-7 · vs Nani/Grollman · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 55% of points 2025-09-07 PPA · 11-3 · vs Rangelov/Hamaguchi · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 57% of points 2025-09-07 PPA · 11-7 · vs Mody/Ruff · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 62% of points 2025-10-05 PPA · 2-11 · vs Yeh/Shaffer · w/ Hanna Duncan · model expected 36% of points 2025-10-05 PPA · 8-11 · vs Yeh/Shaffer · w/ Hanna Duncan · model expected 36% of points 2025-10-05 PPA · 5-15 · vs Conard/Chaffin · w/ Hanna Duncan · model expected 27% of points 2025-11-18 PPA · 11-5 · vs Nilsson/Shaw · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 65% of points 2025-11-18 PPA · 11-13 (OT) · vs Nilsson/Shaw · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 65% of points 2025-11-18 PPA · 5-11 · vs Nilsson/Shaw · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 65% of points 2025-12-16 PPA · 11-4 · vs Gonnering/Wade · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 64% of points 2025-12-16 PPA · 11-9 · vs Gonnering/Wade · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 64% of points 2025-12-16 PPA · 11-6 · vs Herrick/Herrick · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 62% of points 2025-12-16 PPA · 11-5 · vs Herrick/Herrick · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 62% of points 2025-12-19 PPA · 12-10 (OT) · vs Pham/Shaffer · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 59% of points 2025-12-19 PPA · 3-11 · vs Pham/Shaffer · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 59% of points 2025-12-19 PPA · 11-3 · vs Pham/Shaffer · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 59% of points 2025-12-19 PPA · 11-8 · vs Newman/Khlif · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 32% of points 2025-12-19 PPA · 6-11 · vs Newman/Khlif · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 32% of points 2025-12-19 PPA · 5-11 · vs Newman/Khlif · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 32% of points 2026-02-09 PPA · 11-1 · vs Coleman/Rodriguez · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 74% of points 2026-02-09 PPA · 11-2 · vs Coleman/Rodriguez · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 74% of points 2026-02-09 PPA · 10-12 (OT) · vs Gomez/Ganesh · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 60% of points 2026-02-09 PPA · 13-11 (OT) · vs Gomez/Ganesh · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 60% of points 2026-02-09 PPA · 11-2 · vs Gomez/Ganesh · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 60% of points 2026-02-10 PPA · 2-11 · vs Delgado/Loyd · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 44% of points 2026-02-10 PPA · 12-14 (OT) · vs Delgado/Loyd · w/ Zak Parks · model expected 44% of points 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2024 2025 2026 win loss model expectation share of points
Splits
year tour W–L
win% avg score 2024 PPA 6–3 67% 9.1–5.9 2025 PPA 25–19 57% 9.2–8.4 2026 PPA 4–3 57% 10.0–7.6
4–5
deciding games (PPA winner-take-all)
3–4
overtime games (past the target)
22
blowout wins (opponents ≤5)
-2
current streak (+W / −L)
Singles
-0.7 (-4.1…+3.0)
pts vs avg active men’s singles player (90%)
blend
thin record (8 g, 0 DB rallies) + doubles-informed prior
4–4
singles record · last 2025-03
Full singles ratings →
Partners
Chemistry = pair effect beyond the two players' values, in
points per game; almost everything here is honest noise — no pair in the
sport clears statistical significance (why ).
Recent games
date tour partner
opponents score vs exp
2026-02-10 PPA · mens Zak Parks Delgado/Loyd 12-14 OT +2% 2026-02-10 PPA · mens Zak Parks Delgado/Loyd 2-11 -29% 2026-02-09 PPA · mens Zak Parks Gomez/Ganesh 11-2 +24% 2026-02-09 PPA · mens Zak Parks Gomez/Ganesh 13-11 OT-6% 2026-02-09 PPA · mens Zak Parks Gomez/Ganesh 10-12 OT -15% 2026-02-09 PPA · mens Zak Parks Coleman/Rodriguez 11-2 +11% 2026-02-09 PPA · mens Zak Parks Coleman/Rodriguez 11-1 +18% 2025-12-19 PPA · mens Zak Parks Newman/Khlif 5-11 -1% 2025-12-19 PPA · mens Zak Parks Newman/Khlif 6-11 +3% 2025-12-19 PPA · mens Zak Parks Newman/Khlif 11-8 +26% 2025-12-19 PPA · mens Zak Parks Pham/Shaffer 11-3 +20% 2025-12-19 PPA · mens Zak Parks Pham/Shaffer 3-11 -37%
Put Rougel in the simulator →
Unofficial fan analytics based on public results data —
not affiliated with any tour. Every number that has an error bar shows it;
cross-gender rankings are never published as fact (why ).
Model: Bayesian, 36k games, validated 77.4% winner accuracy on 884 unseen
games · data through 2026-10-15.